WhyNot?

Open Packets

Category: Internet
Responses: 2 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 1 in opposition)
Number of views: 284
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

In these days of real time TCP/IP broadcasting and so forth, so many identical packets are sent around the network to individual users. For example, an internet radio staion sends identical packets that clog the network. Why not change the protocol so that individual packets can be sent or read by multiple users, or even by all?

Moreover how about incorperating a file sharing system (with copyright protection of course) That has mirror packets stored on your computer as you receive them. So that when a nearby person requests the same it is sent from the closest available mirror? This would serve the dual perpose of cacheing data from sites the individuals have recently visited so that each time they go back to it they don't have to go through the same slow process again. Such a system would dramatically increase the speed of the internet and take the load off the backbone. It would also reduce the cost enormously. With no major hardware upgrades. This would allow new streaming applications and so forth, so that the internet could finally live up to it's full potential!

spacedeers, Jun 18 2004

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Aerial pictures in flight (160 votes) Very strong
Elevator DeSelect (122 votes) Very strong
Airport charity (123 votes) Very strong
Attachment Notation (117 votes) Very strong
This concept is great! (104 votes) Very strong
like IMDB but for government (80 votes) Very strong
Reverse Ebay: Want to buy XYZ (57 votes) Very strong
Key Number (39 votes) Very strong
worst rated ideas (55 votes) Very strong
Good Samaritan Switch (52 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (Internet):

AgedAdvice.com (2 votes) Average
NerdMakeover.com (2 votes) Average
Integrate Phone and email! (1 votes) Average
My Personal Library on Amazon (5 votes) Strong
RestyleMe.com (2 votes) Average
Better Search Results (5 votes) Average
Healing Viruses (2 votes) Average
Google Porn (7 votes) Weak
face recognition search engine (2 votes) Average
Tech Spec Plugins (1 votes) Average
Ability to Recall E-mail (5 votes) Average
automatic blog cross-posting (1 votes) Average
Directions Route Options (6 votes) Strong
Reverse Ebay: Want to buy XYZ (57 votes) Very strong
Reverse Ebay (13 votes) Very strong
GPS from Photosynth or similar (2 votes) Average
Online Biography project (1 votes) Average
Second-hand Mkt. - Gift Cards (8 votes) Average
IOUs on Friendster, MySpace... (3 votes) Average
Internet pornography solution. (13 votes) Weak
Get rid of the WWW prefix (17 votes) Weak
Extra Storage Space (2 votes) Average
Require Porn sites to be .sex (68 votes) Very strong
Animated Emoticons at Why Not (2 votes) Average
Drag-n-Drop Files to Webpage (4 votes) Average
Malleable Forums (3 votes) Average
Buyers pay reverse auction fee (2 votes) Average
Map-Based Travel Guide (4 votes) Average
Version Grabbing (1 votes) Average
A truly free market (1 votes) Average
Testimonial Website for an EX (3 votes) Average
Mapquest for Walkers (10 votes) Very strong
Better than outdated magazines (2 votes) Average
Electronic Signatures (4 votes) Average
Local Online Service Auctions (2 votes) Average
Porno Viewing Time Counter (4 votes) Average
Blog-ring post aggregator (3 votes) Average
Google Tune (2 votes) Average
freeBay (5 votes) Average
Tracking trains like flights (3 votes) Average
Cell connect (3 votes) Average
Tagging Audio (3 votes) Average
Kidnapping Fedex Shipments (3 votes) Average
Co-operative Broadband (4 votes) Average
Underline anchors (2 votes) Average
Ebay Eye (2 votes) Average
An Open Search engine (2 votes) Average
Grab a shovel (2 votes) Average
Mailing Lists for Any Website (0 votes) Very weak
Online Polling (2 votes) Average
One User Name & Password (3 votes) Average
Good Spam (11 votes) Very strong
Innovative Olympics (6 votes) Average
Data manager (password, addres (2 votes) Average
Why Not Navigation? (1 votes) Average
Intuitive domain name system (4 votes) Average
Ex/Import util. for del.icio.u (2 votes) Average
Postal Address Management (3 votes) Average
SuperWiki (3 votes) Average
Fare Reduction Alert (1 votes) Average
Graphical Evolution (3 votes) Average
Multiple Home Pages (3 votes) Average
mozilla printability detection (2 votes) Average
Reading long texts in browser (2 votes) Average
Anon. Net Access (6 votes) Average
Smarter mail speller (3 votes) Average
Recursive Trackback (3 votes) Weak
Hypefilter for news feeds (2 votes) Average
Window on the World website (2 votes) Average
Audio Email (4 votes) Average
Search-in-store (2 votes) Average
Zip Codes on Location Websites (2 votes) Average
Audio Websites (5 votes) Average
Open Packets (2 votes) Average
Date Code Web Pages (4 votes) Average
Rebay (3 votes) Average
keyboard (5 votes) Average
ISHN Numbers (1 votes) Average
Digital Pictures Archiving (1 votes) Average
More security level groups (1 votes) Average
Commity Wi-Fi meets GRID (2 votes) Average
On holiday (2 votes) Average
A Letters To The Editor site (2 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

I am not a networking expert, but I do believe almost all this already exists. I believe there is a protocol where you subscribe to a stream (like radio) and the routers are set up to be efficient in distibution of packets. Not sure how efficient it is, but I think it is relatively decent. Besides, imagine the overhead to figure out that you and I are neighbors who happen to be listening to WXYZ at the same time, but through different ISPs - how could we really share. You might have to keep a gigantic routing database of all the people listening to WXYZ, but even then you cannot know how close they really are to each other. Even if you and I both use a similar IP address from ATT.net as an ISP, we might still be far away on the network.

When you browse to a website, the images and text are cached to your local computer, but not as packets. This does make it faster. Also, this is how the "net-zero" "turbo" connection works - except I think they cache things for you?

File Sharing: again, how do you determine if someone is "nearby"? Also, what if you are directed to a "mirror" peer computer "nearby", but it is on a 56K modem - yuck.

Puddinhead, Jun 19 2004

In the case of regular websites, there are companies which host cache servers so that a person can access a website quicker, and witout bogging down the whole route to the real host server (whom do have mega pipes)

A home internet connenction, even if broadband, is way too small, plus many ISPs restrict or prohibit servers on customer lines, yes, not to mention the network infrastructure and bandwidth that would be taken up managing nanocaches.

* Those turbo dial-up ISPs not only cache, but the further compress images.

classicsat, Jun 30 2004