WhyNot?

Eye-Tracking Video Drivers

Category: Software
Responses: 2 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 1 in opposition)
Number of views: 520
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

The human eye can see the most detail towards the center of its field of vision. Anywhere else, and I vaguely determine color, at best.

So why does computer software and hardware render the entire screen all the time? Unless I'm looking at the Start button or the clock, I can't read them.

This becomes even more interesting when you think about high-performance video games. The AGP bandwidth can be saturated transferring data and issuing commands regarding parts of the screen I can't really see.

I propose integrating eye-tracking hardware with video drivers in order to only concentrate on the area of the screen I'm paying attention to. Of course, there are technical limitations like refresh rates. My eyes can pan from the top of the screen to the bottom faster than my monitor draws. But that can be overcome with future development.

MikeMol, Jul 26 2004

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Airport charity (133 votes) Very strong
This concept is great! (121 votes) Very strong
Attachment Notation (125 votes) Very strong
Refrigerator (93 votes) Very strong
Ringtones for Landlines (30 votes) Very strong
Electricity from lightning? (21 votes) Very strong
Trojan Horse Credit Cards (26 votes) Very strong
Freecycle - tis a gift to be . (16 votes) Very strong
Freebay (15 votes) Very strong
Multi-Pack soda cases (13 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (Software):

Attachment Notation (125 votes) Very strong
Software Formula for 2000 Years (2 votes) Average
Vector Datatype (2 votes) Average
Fight Recognition Software (2 votes) Average
Triangular Pixels (3 votes) Average
Forwarding sent email message (3 votes) Average
Compiler Security Optimization (3 votes) Average
mute a web page (8 votes) Strong
Organise the Start menu (6 votes) Average
Simple Shared Key Setup (1 votes) Average
DDR-style piano software (4 votes) Average
root means suid (2 votes) Average
Scorchware (2 votes) Average
Six Degrees of Computation (2 votes) Average
X-drive ==> 2 physical drives (3 votes) Average
Fast parallel secure hashing (1 votes) Average
Cascading search (1 votes) Average
Standardized EULA (2 votes) Average
Make Photo Slideshow yourself (2 votes) Average
Searching for images (3 votes) Average
Description field for email (3 votes) Average
Honeypot feedback/automation (1 votes) Average
Audio bass and treble (3 votes) Average
Extension that highlights tags (1 votes) Average
Upper-lower case (2 votes) Average
New image file format (2 votes) Average
Encryption (2 votes) Average
dual scroll bars (6 votes) Average
Tabbed Working (3 votes) Average
Temporary file highlight (5 votes) Strong
Better Search Engine Links (2 votes) Average
Smarter Programming (5 votes) Strong
Linux Distro for Business (2 votes) Average
File multiple rev eliminator (3 votes) Average
Mech. Design Software (2 votes) Average
Checking email addresses (3 votes) Average
Why Powerpoint? Be nonlinear (6 votes) Strong
Chat with iTunes Listeners (2 votes) Average
Studying leaf patterns (2 votes) Average
Ebay database (2 votes) Average
Encrypts the whole OS (2 votes) Average
Wind offset for car (3 votes) Weak
Collaborative License Rating (4 votes) Average
Multiscopic image modeler (2 votes) Average
Simple fix for posting here (1 votes) Average
Torrent-based podcasting (2 votes) Average
Browser Preloads Next Page (4 votes) Average
Officepets (3 votes) Average
Salty encryption (1 votes) Average
Self Authentication & Decryptn (1 votes) Average
Ductile disk encryption (2 votes) Average
Invention Management Software (3 votes) Average
Printing Cost per Page (1 votes) Average
Community Font Classification (1 votes) Average
Ubiquitous virtual honeypots (7 votes) Strong
MS Outlook spouses (1 votes) Average
MS Outlook Contacts updates (1 votes) Average
One card for the wallet (11 votes) Strong
Camera as A4 Scanner (6 votes) Strong
Ogg/PCM (3 votes) Average
Keyboard equivalents (1 votes) Average
OS for visually impaired (4 votes) Average
Window Size Limiter (1 votes) Average
Print Police (1 votes) Average
MS Outlook Highlighter (1 votes) Average
Eye-Tracking Video Drivers (2 votes) Average
Linipedea (3 votes) Weak
MS Word Bookmarks & Summaries (3 votes) Average
anti-virus T-cells (2 votes) Average
savable scroll bars (2 votes) Average
save changes dialog options (3 votes) Average
Viral Marketing in Open Source (7 votes) Weak
Microsoft CD Bug Fixes (4 votes) Average
Virtual Scanner Software (5 votes) Average
Economics Simulation (6 votes) Average
Better Shrink Wrapped License (3 votes) Average
Bayesian learning for (4 votes) Average
enclosures (2 votes) Average
Chat Prog & Problem Solving (2 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Perhaps if it reduced the resolution in the "remote" areas of the screen it might be workable.

I would guess that gaze tracking hardware is a bit out of reach, price-wise, for the average consumer. If it became ubiquitous, I'd like to use it for controlling the pointer or something more functional.

why?, Jul 27 2004