WhyNot?

Improved Moderation

Category: improvement
Responses: 1 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 556
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

In addition to "for, neutral, against", there should be the ability to cast votes for things like, "I don't understand," "Needs refinement," and "re-post modified."

(Since a lot of ideas improve as people modify them in their comments.

MikeMol, Sep 21 2004

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Airport charity (148 votes) Very strong
This concept is great! (141 votes) Very strong
Attachment Notation (137 votes) Very strong
Refrigerator (113 votes) Very strong
Ringtones for Landlines (31 votes) Very strong
Electricity from lightning? (26 votes) Very strong
Trojan Horse Credit Cards (29 votes) Very strong
Freecycle - tis a gift to be . (18 votes) Very strong
Freebay (15 votes) Very strong
Multi-Pack soda cases (13 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (improvement):

Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Oops, I spoke too soon, in another post.

We really think alike, MikeMol!

I'll repeat my comment here where it's more on-topic.

Right now, "against" can mean at least seven different things, maybe more.

- Impractical - Impossible - Harmful - Unmarketable - Incomprehensible - No actual idea was presented, just blabbing - No new idea (product already exists)

I think either we should get to flag which of these categories we think applies, or we should least distinguish between "I'm against this idea" (the first four?) versus "this entry should be disqualified" (the last three?).

kevinb9n, Oct 06 2004