Wireless Networking w/ Radio | |||||||||||||||||
Here's an idea-- using our current 50,000 watt radio towers as giant wireless network broadcasters. Basically, a form of "digital radio" your computer could tap into from even miles away, even in rural areas. Here's how it would work. Normally, radios broadcast music on an analogue signal that your radio picks up in real time. Digital radio would have to work like streaming media works; your computer picks up the streaming media and then plays it, just like Web radio. But music isn't the only thing you could broadcast this way. Television signals, text files (like RSS streams), and even shareware programs-- all could be available for download. Your local station might have "the shareware game hour" from 8-9PM, where it just broadcasted games. Tune in for that hour and you'd start downloading games which, if you liked 'em, you could then purchase them. Perhaps you could get several 10-minute clips of movies... if you liked 'em, you could buy the whole thing and purchase the DVD through the mail. Figuring out check-sums on files would be difficult, because the personal antenna isn't large enough to communicate back to the big antenna. And we really can't have each person with a 1000-watt transmitter/receiver on his or her house... we'd be frying birds as they flew through the air and microwaving children as they played outside. It would be an FCC nightmare, much like dealing with television, radio, CB, HAM, and cell phones have become. This simplifies us down to one major broadcast signal for TV/Radio/anything else you just want to throw at people, and one signal for interpersonal communication (peer to peer). Thoughts?
Mystakaphoros, Mar 04 2005
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add your comment
Except the bandwidth of normal broadcast bands is too small for effective wireless internet, plus there are no return channels.
There are no return channels... very good point. But we put up with that from TV and satellite and cable and radio... so it might still be worth pursuing if only for the sheer range of the broadcast. It wouldn't be 2-way communication, but neither is watching the TV-- it doesn't keep me from spending some time watching the evening news or listening to the new rock song that came on the airwaves. It would simply be a more flexable format. For only the cost of the receiver (and no monthly cost), rural residents could pick up compressed digital feeds of several stations.
If needed, you could even coordinate the feeds with a multiband approach. That would increase bandwidth. And as I recall, the FCC has taken away the rule against one company owning more than one of the same media type in the same city.
Big and complicated -- the normal internet/wireless network is much more practical. The value of the internet is that all types of information can be distributed at once, on demand. This pours a ton of resources into distributing one piece of information to a huge area, where most of the recievers aren't interested in that one piece of information.