WhyNot?

Post-copyright music funding

Category: Music
Responses: 1 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 182
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

Considering how difficult it is for music producers to force music listeners to pay them, we need to find an alternative form of funding. I propose that fans pay the music producers (musicians and recording studios) to release their songs and recordings under a liberal Creative Commons license. This business model is similar to those used by member-supported public radio stations, which could be a supporter of this project (for example, WYEP, http://www.wyep.org).

Public radio stations use the "challenge grant" to give contributors "more bang for their buck". This can be universalized with assurance contracts, as implemented by Fundable.org(http://fundable.org/). Each fan agrees to contribute a certain amount of money ONLY if the total contribution from all fans is enough to "buy" the music.

Once music is released under a Creative Commons license, bands can get publicity from radio play or from systems like Indy Radio (http://indy.tv)

One side effect of this program should be that income is more evenly distributed among musicians and more high-quality music should be produced-- we would have many musicians making $100,000 a year instead of having a few musicians making $10,000,000 per year.

dumllama, Jun 25 2005

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Music):

Comments from other members:

Add your comment

No, the current system is fine. Those that work hard will get paid well for their work. Those that don't, don't get paid.

classicsat, Jun 26 2005