passive restraint system | |||||||||||||||||
I always forget to buckle my seatbelt, so I thought about a way that I and my passengers would be restrained passively, not actually having to do something like buckle the belt. My idea would be to drive the car in reverse or having the seats face toward the rear, I know this sounds radical but just think about it, if you were in a collision, you would not go anywhere because there is no forward body movement. Now how would you steer the car?
wsoilman, Nov 13 2005
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add your comment
Actually this is quite a good idea but difficult for drivers who would need active restraints or a complicated system for driving. But the passengers would do much better in accidents seated backwards. Airline stewards most frequently are seated backwards in difficult conditions and the rest of the passengers would do better likewise.
sand, you are right about the airline flight attendants seated backward, perhaps the driver could face forward as a pilot with all the safety devices in place while the remaining passengers could face rearward in comfortable but very safe enclosed seats.
This is a good idea, but wouldn't rear-ending and rapid accelaration cause frequent discomfort to the passengers when they are rear-seated ?
the vast majority of car collisions are forward, remember you can still use seat belts for a passive rear facing system,and air bags could be used for the driver (pilot). Iam sure that in the future the personal passenger vehicle may look quite different than today. Any and all radical ideas may have merit.
one thing i personaly see wrong with this is for people that suffer from motion sickness, when facing backwards motion sickness is worse and happens quicker. not being able to see where the vehicle is going and being able to anticipate forces of driving for people that are suseptable to motions sickness really isn't a good combination. being able to see what is happening and not just watching it fade away into the distance makes a huge difference in getting sick or not.
I too suffer from motion sickness on occasion, have you ever taken the train in a car with opposing seats, it actually helps to sit backwards.
The idea might work, but there is some argument to whether rear facing seats are better in crashes. You would probably experience less whiplash and your body is better able to sustain damage on your back, but flying objects are now going to strike you in the face or chest. In a high speed crash the crash damage might be more dangerous, but in lower speed crashes objects you have objects in your car might fly into your face or chest.
Didn't they have some cars with the automatic seat belts for awhile? I think there were problems because people were more likely to forget the lapbelt and submarine under the shoulder belt.
Maybe it's possible to use some type of magnetic restrain system instead?