WhyNot?

Attachment Notation

Category: Software
Responses: 121 (104 in support, 4 neutral, 13 in opposition)
Number of views: 4814
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Very strong Very strongYour Rating:

How many people who use email for business purposes have not referenced an attachment in an email and then forgot to attach the file before sending? Depending on the importance/urgency of the attachment this can be more than an inconvenience or embarrassment

Why not have email programs scan the text (much like many do now for spelling) after the send button is clicked, but before the email is sent, for the words attachment or attached. If it finds them but there is not an attachment, it would prompt the user to ensure they want to proceed in sending without an attachment.

mcornillie, Oct 30 2003

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Better Brake Light (350 votes) Very strong
Audio-in Jacks in Cars (149 votes) Very strong
Aerial pictures in flight (176 votes) Very strong
Airport charity (130 votes) Very strong
GPS and Digital Photos (141 votes) Very strong
Elevator DeSelect (128 votes) Very strong
This concept is great! (112 votes) Very strong
like IMDB but for government (89 votes) Very strong
Ending the war on drugs (192 votes) Very strong
Refrigerator (88 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (Software):

Fight Recognition Software (1 votes) Average
Vector Datatype (1 votes) Average
Triangular Pixels (2 votes) Average
Forwarding sent email message (3 votes) Average
Compiler Security Optimization (3 votes) Average
mute a web page (8 votes) Strong
Organise the Start menu (6 votes) Average
Simple Shared Key Setup (1 votes) Average
Attachment Notation (121 votes) Very strong
DDR-style piano software (4 votes) Average
root means suid (2 votes) Average
Scorchware (2 votes) Average
Six Degrees of Computation (2 votes) Average
X-drive ==> 2 physical drives (3 votes) Average
Fast parallel secure hashing (1 votes) Average
Cascading search (1 votes) Average
Standardized EULA (2 votes) Average
Make Photo Slideshow yourself (2 votes) Average
Searching for images (2 votes) Average
Description field for email (3 votes) Average
Honeypot feedback/automation (1 votes) Average
Audio bass and treble (3 votes) Average
Extension that highlights tags (1 votes) Average
Upper-lower case (2 votes) Average
New image file format (2 votes) Average
Encryption (2 votes) Average
dual scroll bars (6 votes) Average
Tabbed Working (3 votes) Average
Temporary file highlight (5 votes) Strong
Better Search Engine Links (2 votes) Average
Smarter Programming (4 votes) Average
Linux Distro for Business (2 votes) Average
File multiple rev eliminator (3 votes) Average
Mech. Design Software (2 votes) Average
Checking email addresses (3 votes) Average
Why Powerpoint? Be nonlinear (6 votes) Strong
Chat with iTunes Listeners (2 votes) Average
Studying leaf patterns (2 votes) Average
Ebay database (2 votes) Average
Encrypts the whole OS (2 votes) Average
Wind offset for car (3 votes) Weak
Collaborative License Rating (4 votes) Average
Multiscopic image modeler (2 votes) Average
Simple fix for posting here (1 votes) Average
Torrent-based podcasting (2 votes) Average
Browser Preloads Next Page (4 votes) Average
Officepets (3 votes) Average
Salty encryption (1 votes) Average
Self Authentication & Decryptn (1 votes) Average
Ductile disk encryption (2 votes) Average
Invention Management Software (3 votes) Average
Printing Cost per Page (1 votes) Average
Community Font Classification (1 votes) Average
Ubiquitous virtual honeypots (7 votes) Strong
MS Outlook spouses (1 votes) Average
MS Outlook Contacts updates (1 votes) Average
One card for the wallet (11 votes) Strong
Camera as A4 Scanner (6 votes) Strong
Ogg/PCM (3 votes) Average
Keyboard equivalents (1 votes) Average
OS for visually impaired (4 votes) Average
Window Size Limiter (1 votes) Average
Print Police (1 votes) Average
MS Outlook Highlighter (1 votes) Average
Eye-Tracking Video Drivers (2 votes) Average
Linipedea (3 votes) Weak
MS Word Bookmarks & Summaries (3 votes) Average
anti-virus T-cells (2 votes) Average
savable scroll bars (2 votes) Average
save changes dialog options (3 votes) Average
Viral Marketing in Open Source (7 votes) Weak
Microsoft CD Bug Fixes (4 votes) Average
Virtual Scanner Software (4 votes) Average
Economics Simulation (5 votes) Average
Better Shrink Wrapped License (3 votes) Average
Bayesian learning for (3 votes) Average
enclosures (2 votes) Average
Chat Prog & Problem Solving (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Good idea! The method of checking for the word attachment, would result in false calls when replying to messages with inline of past transactions. So if you reply to a e-mail where the sender has an attachment and the message is inline of your reply, the program will ask you for attachments.

Simpler solution would be to make two options for compose message. One would be for Compose/Reply, the other Compose/Reply with Attachment. The second option will ask for check for the attachement before sending the e-mail.

sath45, Oct 31 2003

like it (+)

np, Nov 01 2003

This is a great solution to an embarassing problem. As is "Compose with Attachment".

mithryll1, Nov 01 2003

I think this is a good idea and could easily be implemented. An occasional false positive would be a small annoyance compared to having to resend an email because you forgot the attachment. The feature could be completely disabled, too.

Now if there were some way to guard against “Reply To All” when you really just wanted to “Reply”.

landon9720, Nov 01 2003

Reply to all is not just a problem in email. My firm installed LotusSametime (Intranet based instant message). A collegue sent a Sametime "announcement" message, but forgot to select any recipients. As a result, everyone in the building (perhaps more) received it.

mithryll1, Nov 01 2003

when you forget to attach a file to an email, doesn't the embarrassment teach you a lesson to pay attention next time?

makefatpay, Nov 10 2003

A colleague of my wife wrote a macro for MS Outlook that did just this.. it ran when the "send" button was clicked, looked for the word "enclosed" and "attached" in an email - and then flagged up a message if no attachment was found.

dannynic, Nov 20 2003

Or you could attach your file first.

rebolin, Jan 21 2004

Perhaps an addition to this logic could be to scan for your bosses name or the entire company distribution and confirm that you want to send the mail. How many of you have received an email from someone who meant to send it to one person but blurted it out to the whole company (including the president?)

Whoops.

dseif88429, Feb 21 2004

Great idea but I think it could be quite annoying in practice. For example if someone send you an email with an attachment file and you reply it (of course without sending the file again) you have to click to close there "Attachment missing" promts. If the chain is going to be long you have to delete all the attachment words in the text and so on. Or go to options to turn that function off.

puma3, Mar 13 2005

Perhaps a better way is to have a choice of creating a new e-mail either plain or with an attachment. Either "New e-mail" or "New e-mail w/attachment." Only with the latter choice would a prompt be surfaced.

bz, Jun 08 2005

The time I hate when this happens the worst is when I am sending a company a resume in application for a job. That second mail with the attachment is a painful one! <:

SteeleS, Jun 23 2005

Ouch!

mcornillie, Jun 23 2005

The <a href="http://www.kde.org>KDE mailer KMail (part of the Kontact Suite) has this feature for years now. ;)

You can even configure it very flexibly. (screenshot)

physos, Jun 26 2005

This could easily be added to Mozilla Thunderbird with an extension.

EvilTechie, Sep 01 2005

Very good idea. I don't think adding another category of "Reply" or "Compose" will make anything better: you could decide to attach something in mid-writing and then forget. I think the best solution is to have you software react immediately after you type the word "attach", and ask you to "Attach now", "Attach Later" or "Ignore".

SandFlyer, Nov 07 2005

Here it is for those of you who have Outlook. http://www.emailaddressmanager.com/outlook/alerts.html

mikeada, Nov 11 2005

So if you reply to a e-mail where the sender has an attachment and the message is inline of your reply, the program will ask you for attachments.

No, that wouldn't be an issue. It's trivial for the mail program to understand which regions of the message are quoting, and which are what you just wrote. Programs today already can be configured to ignore the quoted portion when checking spelling (what's the point correcting someone else's spelling). It could just exclude those areas for this too.

danpritchard, Jan 03 2006

How much idiot-proofing does a program need? :P I'll admit that I'd done it myself, but I'd never think (or want to expect) the program to pick up on it for me.

Sonic Flash, Mar 14 2006

Idiot proofing is a warning label on your microwave telling you not to use it to dry your cat. This is just a functional aid for a common problem, such as asking if you want to save a document before your close it or spell check before you send an email. Otherwise we are all idiots--including the previous commenter, who admitted to this mistake.

mcornillie, Mar 14 2006

Don't think this is practical. E.g.:
"Why are you so attached to this idea?"
"Bitte findest Du als Anhang dieses E-mail ...."

This belongs in the same category as the above-mentioned warning on microwaving cats, and
"objects in this mirror may be closer than they look"
WRONG, they are exactly as close as they look, but maybe closer than you mis-interpret them to be. Such protected against human mistakes just annoy people more often then they help.

ChrisF, May 18 2006

I successfully use this "idea" sice several months! It works fine! If you try sending an email which talks about attachments but does not contain any attachment, you will be warned by a message which sounds like "This email talks about attachments but has NO attachments: send it anyway? YES/NO".Just a click, and you'll avoid any embarassing situation!

Some companies sell this product... but some internet users give it out for free!http://www.danevans.co.uk/vba/

Just look for "outlook attachment thisoutlooksession" in Google ;-)

jumpjack, Jul 07 2006

You are talking about having an AI program to understand your text before sending out. The program cannot just stupidly search for the word "Attach" and prompt the user. Otherwise the program will be too annoying to the user, and soon the user will come back here to suggest, "why not remove it"

Jimmy Wang, Jul 19 2006

@Jimmy:Are you sure? How many times you write "attachment" in your email, without referring to an attachment you are sending? ;-)Try, and you'll see.

jumpjack, Jul 30 2006

Just have another checkbox in the compose window : Remind me to include attachment if its not attached already before sending this email.

marun, Sep 01 2006

Just have another checkbox in the compose window : Remind me to include attachment if its not attached already before sending this email.

marun, Sep 01 2006

Just have another checkbox in the compose window : Remind me to include attachment if its not attached already before sending this email.

marun, Sep 01 2006

More help from the boggus paper clip ... no thanks!

bandolex, Jan 24 2007

I like it. Of course, you can always ignore or override the warning, but it would be nice to have that option.

ChrisD, Jan 28 2007

I always add the attachment before I type the message or enter an address. Works for me.

wizard61, Mar 30 2007

There should be an add-on option for this. It could even begin by just being offered for premium/paid email accounts (which at least some e-mail services offer).

thinkedaloud, Jun 08 2007

It's a great idea and I know it will be an easy program to create, distribute and download for any email/internet provider. But, do you want it in your office? What other words could the IT person at your place of business have flagged.Then the email can be read by your employer for whatever justification he, she or they deem pertinent, vital, secure etc.. The internet at your place of employment isn't yours. I suggest useing the good old fashioned post-it note.

organic, Dec 12 2007

There is a macro that you can copy and paste that would solve this for Outlook. It can be found at http://searchexchange.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid43_gci1126071,00.htmlNo guarantees on its effectiveness but does provide an interim solution

frankyong, Jan 23 2008

Do you need a reminder to wipe before you stand up too?

ImpatientInventor, Jan 26 2008