WhyNot?

Edit my comments

Category: Upgrade Features
Responses: 6 (5 in support, 1 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 809
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Strong StrongYour Rating:

Why doesnt the website include a link to edit your comment once it has been posted, I have posted one or two comments on this side that I wouldnt mind editing. One of which was for clarity, another was because of a mistake. This seems only logical to me, whaddya think?

-JM

JM, Sep 13 2006

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Upgrade Features):

WhyNot Wiki (18 votes) Very strong
Don't email user's own comment (1 votes) Average
WN Needs ECONOMIC Category (1 votes) Average
Comment count vs vote count (1 votes) Average
Center Submit Button (1 votes) Average
how did you find this place? (2 votes) Average
Homonym spell-checker (17 votes) Very strong
Latest layout (3 votes) Average
Place cursor in comment box (1 votes) Average
when you vote - get a new idea (5 votes) Average
newer comments first (1 votes) Average
No More Secrets (3 votes) Weak
"Its Done!" option in WhyNot (4 votes) Average
Old Idea Deletion (5 votes) Average
Credit Card Security (2 votes) Average
flag as objectionable, spam (4 votes) Average
comment tree (3 votes) Average
Back to same place on page (2 votes) Average
Vote terms (4 votes) Average
Conglomerate Carriers (1 votes) Average
What's Meant By 'Recent'? (2 votes) Average
VerticalJavascriptCategoryNav (2 votes) Average
Commercial Free TV (4 votes) Average
Rejected idea (3 votes) Average
Red/Green for idea tracking (2 votes) Average
Edit my comments (6 votes) Strong
Catagories (3 votes) Average
Screennames (3 votes) Average
Editing (4 votes) Average
Funny category (2 votes) Average
Most discussed (2 votes) Average
My favourite (2 votes) Average
Pre-loaded iPod (7 votes) Strong
Who's On-line ? (5 votes) Average
fictional story category (4 votes) Average
Use a graphic for vote-count (1 votes) Average
Comment Organizer (1 votes) Average
Need Government Category (1 votes) Average
Unused space (2 votes) Average
"Report as Spam" Button (6 votes) Strong
More Votes & Comments (2 votes) Average
Comment feedback (1 votes) Average
Email updates from whynot.net (3 votes) Average
RSS Feed for WhyNot.net (4 votes) Average
Spell Check (7 votes) Average
WhyNot pages Counter (2 votes) Average
Provide Voted Priority (4 votes) Average
Option to Hide Previous Viewed (2 votes) Average
Look List (3 votes) Average
Book on CD (3 votes) Average
Doodle design (3 votes) Average
Delete Ideas (2 votes) Average
Site communication (2 votes) Average
Users who hated this idea also (4 votes) Average
Make All Text Sizes Relative (4 votes) Average
Page size (3 votes) Average
additional html tag (1 votes) Average
WhyNot Corporate/Non-Profit (4 votes) Average
Order of Ideas (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

yea I had the same idea sept 12 Spell Check

briansalvesen, Sep 13 2006

Good example for editing is this post. Somehow my original title got messed up it was: A "why not" for "Why Not?".... wish i could edit that too.. LOL

JM, Sep 13 2006

The text box parser is very particular about the tags being lowercase, rather than uppercase.

nayhem, Sep 13 2006

I would rather have my messages archived and I can put up an updated message for people to view. That way, everyone can look on the dates of archived messages and discover if the authors of the idea and messages changed their context.
If I propose an idea and make a dreadful error that makes myself look bad, and others correct me with good intentions, then I go change my idea accordingly, then the others look like they don't know what they are talking about.
I think a wholely different message system should be looked at in detail.

You should have an hour or two to make a correction before your text is frozen. That's the way the Invision forum software works. (The administrator sets the time limit.) That way, the subsequent comment stream can't be rendered irrelevant, except in rare cases.

Roger Knights, Jun 30 2008