WhyNot?

WhyNot pages Counter

Category: Upgrade Features
Responses: 2 (2 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 752
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

There should be a webpage visit "counter" that shows how many DIFFERENT persons have viewed each idea. That way the submitter knows how many people have read their idea (interest), as well as how many people have responded.

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Better Brake Light (446 votes) Very strong
GPS and Digital Photos (173 votes) Very strong
like IMDB but for government (109 votes) Very strong
Aerial pictures in flight (218 votes) Very strong
Ending the war on drugs (248 votes) Very strong
Airport charity (148 votes) Very strong
This concept is great! (141 votes) Very strong
Attachment Notation (137 votes) Very strong
Ziploc chip bags (104 votes) Very strong
Refrigerator (113 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (Upgrade Features):

Comment count vs vote count (2 votes) Average
WhyNot Wiki (18 votes) Very strong
Don't email user's own comment (1 votes) Average
WN Needs ECONOMIC Category (1 votes) Average
Center Submit Button (1 votes) Average
how did you find this place? (2 votes) Average
Homonym spell-checker (17 votes) Very strong
Latest layout (3 votes) Average
Place cursor in comment box (1 votes) Average
when you vote - get a new idea (5 votes) Average
newer comments first (1 votes) Average
No More Secrets (3 votes) Weak
"Its Done!" option in WhyNot (4 votes) Average
Old Idea Deletion (5 votes) Average
Credit Card Security (2 votes) Average
flag as objectionable, spam (4 votes) Average
comment tree (3 votes) Average
Back to same place on page (2 votes) Average
Vote terms (4 votes) Average
Conglomerate Carriers (1 votes) Average
What's Meant By 'Recent'? (2 votes) Average
VerticalJavascriptCategoryNav (2 votes) Average
Commercial Free TV (4 votes) Average
Rejected idea (3 votes) Average
Red/Green for idea tracking (2 votes) Average
Edit my comments (6 votes) Strong
Catagories (3 votes) Average
Screennames (3 votes) Average
Editing (4 votes) Average
Funny category (2 votes) Average
Most discussed (2 votes) Average
My favourite (2 votes) Average
Pre-loaded iPod (7 votes) Strong
Who's On-line ? (5 votes) Average
fictional story category (4 votes) Average
Use a graphic for vote-count (1 votes) Average
Comment Organizer (1 votes) Average
Need Government Category (1 votes) Average
Unused space (2 votes) Average
"Report as Spam" Button (6 votes) Strong
More Votes & Comments (2 votes) Average
Comment feedback (1 votes) Average
Email updates from whynot.net (3 votes) Average
RSS Feed for WhyNot.net (4 votes) Average
Spell Check (7 votes) Average
WhyNot pages Counter (2 votes) Average
Provide Voted Priority (4 votes) Average
Option to Hide Previous Viewed (2 votes) Average
Look List (3 votes) Average
Book on CD (3 votes) Average
Doodle design (3 votes) Average
Delete Ideas (2 votes) Average
Site communication (2 votes) Average
Users who hated this idea also (4 votes) Average
Make All Text Sizes Relative (4 votes) Average
Page size (3 votes) Average
additional html tag (1 votes) Average
WhyNot Corporate/Non-Profit (4 votes) Average
Order of Ideas (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Perhaps add another voting button for "Very Interesting" "Just Looking" "I'm NOT interested".

With the current voting changed to "Technically Feasible" "Seems Plausible" "Not Practical" "Not Doable".

I think counters could be used in a few places on this site as well. There's actually a flaw in the "Voting History" page with the light-bulb icon. The icon key says that it represents "The community's level of support for this idea" and yet I see ideas that are 100% agreed with that have a broken light-bulb next to them. I think that the light-bulb icon is determined by the # of votes or views, and has nothing to do with the "I agree" or "I disagree" voting results. That should be fixed.

johnnyblista_, Jan 13 2007