WhyNot?

Bring back the OTA

Category: Government
Responses: 2 (2 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 443
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

During the timespan of 1972-1995, there existed an Office of Technological Assessment. This office was created by the US congress in order to have a source of unbiased, scientific knowledge to have at their disposal. Basically, the OTA was formed as a balance to biased presidental science advisors, such as those of the Nixon, Reagan and latter Bush administrations. Unfortunately, the office was disbanded in 1995 and they never had a chance to check Bush's science advisors.

Why not bring this office back?

We need them desperately today in the US, where any science henchman can be hired to say that "global warming isn't real", or that "second-hand smoke is harmless". These high-profile counters to general scientific truths are impeding safety measures that could very well save our lives in years to come.

Some members of congress have been fighting for the past decade to bring back the OTA, but they're a minority that is easily trampled by a heard of blind donkeys and elephants. We need to put pressure on congress on local and national levels to form a new Office of Technology Assessment. I don't have a specific idea of how to get this done, but I'm hoping someone here does.

CDugan, Dec 02 2006

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Better Brake Light (361 votes) Very strong
Ending the war on drugs (204 votes) Very strong
like IMDB but for government (93 votes) Very strong
Audio-in Jacks in Cars (154 votes) Very strong
Elevator DeSelect (134 votes) Very strong
Attachment Notation (124 votes) Very strong
Refrigerator (92 votes) Very strong
Cable TV (92 votes) Very strong
Ringtones for Landlines (30 votes) Very strong
worst rated ideas (63 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (Government):

Comments from other members:

Add your comment

*herd

CDugan, Dec 02 2006

I just voted "agree," but you should clarify your understanding of second-hand smoke. The studies that have found correlations were (I've read) between the spouse and a heavy smoker. Extrapolating this to and equivalent effect from casual contact with second-hand smoke in a restaurant is unwarranted.

Roger Knights, Jul 17 2008