WhyNot?

Hot Water Recirculator

Category: Gadgets/Appliances/Electronics
Responses: 7 (2 in support, 0 neutral, 5 in opposition)
Number of views: 1366
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Weak WeakYour Rating:

Current recirculators use household power for the pump and thermostat. I believe that you can draw enough power from flowing water to do the same job, eliminating the need to connect the recirculator to an outlet. Just add two small turbines, connect them to a generator and a rechargeable battery. The battery powers the pump and thermostat, though the former might have to be lighter duty than on a powered recirculator.

nayhem, Jan 01 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Gadgets/Appliances/Electronics):

Best Air Conditioner Invention (1 votes) Average
Network laundry room (5 votes) Average
Auto-closing garage door... (7 votes) Strong
RFID Writer for Home Use (3 votes) Average
Auto-Stop for Clothes Dryer (1 votes) Average
A fan that really works (2 votes) Average
Remote Residencial Doorlock (2 votes) Average
Only Light Off Switch (3 votes) Average
Door locks (30 votes) Very strong
No More Wires (10 votes) Very strong
Remote Control Finder (16 votes) Very strong
Home planetarium (4 votes) Average
Finding stuff (5 votes) Average
Self Testing Fire Alarm (2 votes) Average
MP3 Door Bell (13 votes) Very strong
PDA Wireless Home Intercom (4 votes) Average
Washer/Dryer in one appliance! (5 votes) Average
Disabling applicance clocks (8 votes) Average
Auto-off AC/DC converter (2 votes) Average
Hot Water Recirculator (7 votes) Weak
Smart Key for your home (2 votes) Average
Secure drop box for packages (8 votes) Strong
No power consuming standby (2 votes) Average
Wireless Personal Thermostat (1 votes) Average
Wi-Fi Designer Appliance (4 votes) Average
A Smart Phone (3 votes) Average
RFID pet collar (4 votes) Average
Coffee Alarm (5 votes) Strong
Keyless House Door Entry (8 votes) Strong
RFID book storage (2 votes) Average
Music Management/Storage (3 votes) Average
Bluetooth Remote Control (10 votes) Strong
'Ollie North' Mailbox (3 votes) Average
Sewing in more than one direct (2 votes) Average
automatic burner (5 votes) Weak
progammable sunrise lights (3 votes) Average
Mobile text2speech scanner (2 votes) Average
remotely setting the video (1 votes) Average
Remote cntrol w/voice recorder (2 votes) Average
battery operated floor brush (1 votes) Average
Domino organizer (1 votes) Average
Front Door VoiceMail/Greeting (8 votes) Strong
In-wall moisture sensors (4 votes) Average
Share TiVo recordings (3 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Ah yes. And there's perpetual motion.

sand, Jan 02 2007

I don't think I want to slow the flow. . .

Hyenuf, Jan 02 2007

I'm pretty sure there's enough pressure in the lines, especially if you use limited flow faucets/showerheads. This would be the source of the converted energy; it would't just pop out of nowhere, sand.

nayhem, Jan 02 2007

There is not enough power in the flowing water a household uses to be capturable for domestic use to noticably cut down on the electric bill, and still provide useable flow of the water. An its not free energy, it costs energy to pump that water into your house, and might increase your waterbill due to increased pumping costs by your water utility.

classicsat, Jan 04 2007

The point is not to recapture the energy for household power, rather for the recirculator itself. The recirculator just pumps cooled water in the hot water line into the cold water line. Its source of power would be waterflow (mechanical energy converted and stored) from normal faucet use, rather than the electrical outlet.

nayhem, Jan 04 2007

How about recapture on the downstream side instead of the upstream side? I probably wouldn't put a device on my toilet, but a turbine under the kitchen sink would sure get alot of spin action... <tg>

telecomguy, Jan 05 2007

This might work, but it would slow the flow of the water to some degree and the amount of electrical power used by the standard recirculator is too small to be of any real significance. I think the tiny amount of electricity this would save would not make up for the annoyance of the reduction in water flow.

Dwane Anderson, Jan 05 2007

Oh, and putting a turbine in your drain would produce a trivial amount of power and would greatly increase the frequency of clogging the drain.

Dwane Anderson, Jan 05 2007

nayhem: Excellent Idea
Although I do not presently see a practical use for minimizing energy usage in hot water recirculators, I do see a use for generating a small amount of electrical power for the remote control of remote sense water meters and the associated cutoff valve like you have in most homes.

The turbine could produce a small charging current to charge a high value capacitor or long-life rechargeable battery. The remote control circuitry would be driven by the charge off the capacitor and a pilot controlled valve could be manipulated by the control circuit to open and close the main valve. This would eliminate the need for external power so the unit could be wireless.

Excellent Idea

The payback period (where the cost of the unit, labor to install it, upkeep = the savings) would be decades not just years as in hotwater solar panels or wind generators. Now if you were a city like Vegas putting a water turbine deep in the canyon and feed waste water thru it would pay foor itself in just a few years.

CSM, Jun 27 2007