There’s a science and mathematical explanation behind it, but all it takes is to find that formula and solution, right? Based on experience, careful observation, and as a daily commuter in the Los Angeles traffic, I think I may've just figured out a theory. The only way to explain it for now is by doing the 'marbles in the bottle' analysis.

Tipping the bottle too fast will obviously create congestion, right? But tipping it gently, gives it a flow! It might be slow, but it’s still a flow, & that's exactly how simple freeway traffic works! If there’s a speed limit law requiring everyone to slow down during rush hour on certain freeways and roads, traffic would mostly be flowing rather than stopping and going.

As the freeways get packed during peak hours of the day, most drivers are NOT aware of slowing down because the speed limit says so. So intentionally, drivers tend to speed up to the limit because they can. But if the roads ahead are too cramped up, then there’s absolutely no space to run fast all. This is when the ‘bumper-to-bumper’ traffic begins.

Ever wonder why was there traffic but not a single accident around?

Law of physics disagrees to a speeding driver during busy time. They will always end up tail gaiting the car ahead of them, which leads to hitting the brakes or even accidents. But did you know that by tapping the brake pedal just ONCE could eventually lead traffic to a complete halt at some point causing a chain reaction? I personally call this one the ‘wave of brake lights’ effect. Technically, it’s also called ‘stop-n-go’ traffic.

Speed limits should be posted electronically because of its frequent change depending on how many cars are on the road. Cars should be counted by computers as they enter the freeway, and the higher the count, the slower the speed limit should be.

If this theory makes sense, it could help prevent any of the above from happening and traffic will always be in constant motion. Also, let’s not forget about lesser impact on accidents. Drivers will be more careful and patient from driving that it would actually save time and lives in the long run.

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

I agree

No opinion

I disagree