UCE(2)

The idea is pretty simple and the abuse and misuse of power by various govts around the world makes it even more desireable now.

Now, what happens is that everybody knows that threatning things are happening in a particular country but none can interfere because they simply declare it an INTERNAL MATTER and continue. With UCE, a global govt. you eliminate this barrier and involve in these so called INTERNAL MATTERS. Latest examples? Sudan ( Darfur), Iran, N. Korea, china( polution, human rights, space interferance) and so many others. In fact, all the countries are taking advantage of the loopholes in the current global political system. All the countries are fully aware of the handicaps and inadequecies of UN and its impotence in dealing with certain matters.

Therefore, UN should be dissolved and UCE should be found. This will counterweigh and plug the loopholes, making things happen on the ground by possesing and enforcing power to interfere directly.

UCE will be able to preserve and maintain the order and balance more efficiantly than todays govts and UN. UCE will find more DIRECT, suitable, rational and quicker solutions to problems like poverty, wars, corruption, economical disparities, human rights, climate change, endangered species, rain forests etc. In this case all the issues are viewed globally, not regionally. All that is national today will become regional. All the national govts of today will become subordinate govts under UCE and function more or less under the direction of UCE and will be liable to report to it.

All that is important to the world and in the favour of mother earth and its children, is adopted and all that is irrational, harmfull is discarded. All the matters are discussed with all other representatives from around the world and solutions and suggestions are found, voted and bills passed on the basis of fundamental democratic rules.

So, where is the problem? I really wonder, why people on this site have only shown their sceptical view to this easy, democratic and revolutionay thought? Why can't we choose UCE representatives from the existing govts and discuss matters on broader scale( global scale)?

Whatever local political system or religion the countries might have, democtratic or communistic, Muslim or Christian, hardly makes any sense as long as they conform and comply to international rules which are framed using common sense, in the common interest of the world( including them) and deliver positive results for common people.

Lets see, if UN was not founded and if I had suggested this idea for the first time, how would you react?

Same way? UN was also seen as <an impossible thought> once but it occurred and became a reality. In my opinion, we must see UN as our first experiment which has delivered at times but now, it has started loosing its grip and authority.Time and again it has expressed its helplessness in dealing with serious global matters. It has become a vulnerable and manipulative organization, mainly because it is not directly connected with the common people. It will remain so or even worsen, as long as it exists as passive organization. It is still only a directory organization and can not interfere and virtually lead a nation in crisis. It still relies on others to come forward, accept its resolutions and show results. It can only show its contentment or resentment in the aftermath of time. Nothing more.

Todays requirement is a body, more drastic, more powerfull, authorized and able to handle the worlds problems by directly imposing on the defaulting countries and eventually <takeing-over> their custody, if neccessary. No wars will be fought in this case, no weapons are produced and merchandized, no nuclear tests are required, no terrorism will exist, no caste, religion or economic wars are fought. Only The biased powers are poised and the <killing instinct> of competition is subdued, not competition. All that is done is done with the mutual consent and joint agreement of all the countries of the world. All that is thought is thought in the common interest of the world. The corrupt and incompetant are displaced and brought before justice without red-tapism and precious loss of time and people’s sufferings.

I don’t claim that problems will come to an end and the world will become a heaven but the views will be broadened, angles changed and the intensity of hate and selfishness causing dangerours consequences will disappear to a great extent.Unrests and resentments will still be seen but then they will be seen and tackled on a totally different scale, perpective and fashion.

The subject is vast and can not be explained on this web-site, therefore, I would end by saying that only a positive thinking can change this world and only revolutionary steps pave new ways. And I am not suggesting anything new to be done, only I am saying is to utilize our modern experiences of political systems and expand the scale of democracy and make them global on the same fundamental principles which already exist. The frame or chasis of UN be kept and more powerfull & latest UCE motor installed. Its just like adding one higher floor to the existing building.

If someone claims that the existing systems are flawless and nothing CAN or SHOULD be done, I would like to hear Why?

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

I agree

No opinion

I disagree