WhyNot?

Better Search Results

Category: Internet
Responses: 5 (3 in support, 1 neutral, 1 in opposition)
Number of views: 475
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

This is a simple and quick one. Google (or whoever else wants to jump on the opportunity) releases a simple add on to their toolbar that allows a user to QUICKLY rate ANY webpage, from 1 to 5 stars. This rating, and in turn the cumulative ratings of all the people using this system are sent back to the Search Engine in question, who then uses these peer ratings to influence and improve search results.

This is simply in response to 'false' results, or results of poor quality that still manage to show up at the top of search results pages. If enough people rate these poor web pages as 1 star, eventually they will fall out of favor, and conversely, the lesser known but more deserving web pages can rise to the top, BASED OFF OF CONTENT QUALITY.

ThatForumPlaceDotCom, Feb 08 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Internet):

5kbps Local Wifi Node (1 votes) Average
Wikipedia for Original Content (1 votes) Average
Mapquest for Walkers (13 votes) Very strong
Reverse Ebay: Want to buy XYZ (63 votes) Very strong
Web directions with landmarks (2 votes) Average
NerdMakeover.com (2 votes) Average
P2P over HTTPS - ISP nightmare (1 votes) Average
AgedAdvice.com (2 votes) Average
Integrate Phone and email! (1 votes) Average
My Personal Library on Amazon (8 votes) Strong
RestyleMe.com (2 votes) Average
Better Search Results (5 votes) Average
Healing Viruses (2 votes) Average
Google Porn (7 votes) Weak
face recognition search engine (2 votes) Average
Tech Spec Plugins (1 votes) Average
Ability to Recall E-mail (5 votes) Average
automatic blog cross-posting (1 votes) Average
Directions Route Options (6 votes) Strong
Reverse Ebay (13 votes) Very strong
GPS from Photosynth or similar (2 votes) Average
Online Biography project (1 votes) Average
Second-hand Mkt. - Gift Cards (9 votes) Average
IOUs on Friendster, MySpace... (3 votes) Average
Internet pornography solution. (13 votes) Weak
Get rid of the WWW prefix (17 votes) Weak
Extra Storage Space (2 votes) Average
Require Porn sites to be .sex (73 votes) Very strong
Animated Emoticons at Why Not (2 votes) Average
Drag-n-Drop Files to Webpage (4 votes) Average
Malleable Forums (3 votes) Average
Buyers pay reverse auction fee (2 votes) Average
Map-Based Travel Guide (4 votes) Average
Version Grabbing (1 votes) Average
A truly free market (1 votes) Average
Testimonial Website for an EX (3 votes) Average
Better than outdated magazines (2 votes) Average
Electronic Signatures (4 votes) Average
Local Online Service Auctions (2 votes) Average
Porno Viewing Time Counter (4 votes) Average
Blog-ring post aggregator (3 votes) Average
Google Tune (2 votes) Average
freeBay (5 votes) Average
Tracking trains like flights (3 votes) Average
Cell connect (3 votes) Average
Tagging Audio (3 votes) Average
Kidnapping Fedex Shipments (3 votes) Average
Co-operative Broadband (4 votes) Average
Underline anchors (2 votes) Average
Ebay Eye (2 votes) Average
An Open Search engine (2 votes) Average
Grab a shovel (2 votes) Average
Mailing Lists for Any Website (0 votes) Very weak
Online Polling (2 votes) Average
One User Name & Password (3 votes) Average
Good Spam (12 votes) Very strong
Innovative Olympics (6 votes) Average
Data manager (password, addres (2 votes) Average
Why Not Navigation? (1 votes) Average
Intuitive domain name system (4 votes) Average
Ex/Import util. for del.icio.u (2 votes) Average
Postal Address Management (3 votes) Average
SuperWiki (4 votes) Average
Fare Reduction Alert (1 votes) Average
Graphical Evolution (3 votes) Average
Multiple Home Pages (3 votes) Average
mozilla printability detection (2 votes) Average
Reading long texts in browser (3 votes) Average
Anon. Net Access (6 votes) Average
Smarter mail speller (3 votes) Average
Recursive Trackback (3 votes) Weak
Hypefilter for news feeds (2 votes) Average
Window on the World website (2 votes) Average
Audio Email (4 votes) Average
Search-in-store (2 votes) Average
Zip Codes on Location Websites (2 votes) Average
Audio Websites (5 votes) Average
Open Packets (2 votes) Average
Date Code Web Pages (4 votes) Average
Rebay (3 votes) Average
keyboard (5 votes) Average
ISHN Numbers (1 votes) Average
Digital Pictures Archiving (1 votes) Average
More security level groups (1 votes) Average
Commity Wi-Fi meets GRID (2 votes) Average
On holiday (2 votes) Average
A Letters To The Editor site (2 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

The problem with this is, my tastes may be different than the majority. I might like sites that most other people don't.

Dwane Anderson, Feb 08 2007

This rating should also show what kind of class the contents have. Professional( technical), commercial or general(informative). Based on the nature of the contents. So that you can straightaway click the site you think is good enough to provide you the information you desire.

One would save a lot of time.

Naresh Ahuja, Feb 09 2007

It would be nice to have only relevant search results. But the problem of your idea is that it would be rather easy to write a robot (meaning a program/script) that could get some irrelevant pages to the top. This would open a new scope for spammers.

estonto, Feb 09 2007

Because of the spam/robot problem, this would work only with registered known-valid users. How about if Google allows only its own employees to rate sites, as a first step. A second step would be to add employees of a dozen other large employers. A sample of a few hundred thousand users would give good enough guidance to be more helpful than the current unrated system.

Roger Knights, May 25 2008