WhyNot?

Elliminating the carousel

Category: Other
Responses: 2 (2 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 421
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

The baggage carousel in the airport is terribly inefficient. What I would like to see would be a system that elliminates the carousel all together. Maybe they could put RFID tags in the luggage tags and then have a machine that sorts the bags automatically. Then, instead of having all the bags come out of one chute on a carousel, they could come out of multiple chutes on separate conveyor belts.

For example, there could be ten numbered chutes, each with its own conveyor belt. Each passenger will have their bags tagged with a number, 1-10, and will have the tag number put on their ticket. If you have multiple bags, they will all get the same number. Then, at the destination, your bags will come out of the chute that matches the number on your ticket. Being that there are ten conveyors, only one tenth of the passengers will be waiting at any given conveyor. This would reduce crowding dramatically and make baggage retrieval much faster and easier.

If there's enough room in the terminal, there could be more than ten chutes. The tags could simply include numbers greater than ten, or they could use letters for up to 26 chutes.

All the chutes could be in the same long wall. The conveyors would simply carry the bags straight out into the room. All the conveyors would be parallel, with enough space between them for people to stand on both sides of each conveyor plus room to walk past each other. Any bags not picked up immediately will just collect at the end of the conveyors. The belt should only move when a bag is added to it. Once the bag is moved out of the chute, the belt would stop until another bag is added. This will reduce needless wear on the bottom of the bags and would also save electricity.

Dwane Anderson, Feb 10 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Other):

human condition & money (1 votes) Average
Finding a parking space (17 votes) Very strong
Lottery at PayTolls (1 votes) Average
free furnace (1 votes) Average
High tent for outdoor concerts (1 votes) Average
DVR Sharing/Networking (1 votes) Average
dentistry on a plane (2 votes) Average
Glass with thermometer (2 votes) Average
Directions (In plain English.) (1 votes) Average
Radio TiVo (11 votes) Strong
FREE SNAIL MAIL (2 votes) Average
Clothing Exchange (2 votes) Average
Cold weather gloves (2 votes) Average
Double sided Velcro tape (3 votes) Average
Single wallet ID card (3 votes) Average
Digital Photo Editing Service (1 votes) Average
Twist surprise egg machine (1 votes) Average
mom's cuddle (4 votes) Average
Poinsettia Recycling (1 votes) Average
baby (4 votes) Average
Cigarettes w/ Strikeable Tips (2 votes) Average
Introduce 'talking' or 'quiet' (1 votes) Average
Virtual planets (2 votes) Average
Bring back Led Zeppelin!!!!! (2 votes) Average
Unique Voice Generation (1 votes) Average
Voice clarity (2 votes) Average
Babyface (1 votes) Average
Transatlantic By Pendulum (6 votes) Weak
Life Indicators on batteries (2 votes) Average
authors for hire (3 votes) Average
Move Mars to better orbit (8 votes) Weak
Use Commuters as a workforce (0 votes) Very weak
Texture Mapping Digital Camera (2 votes) Average
Hanging jigsaw puzzle (1 votes) Average
Hanging jigsaw puzzle (2 votes) Average
Jigsaw Puzzle w/out Cover Pic (2 votes) Average
Mobile Sun Block Booth (4 votes) Average
Useless info on top whynot.net (1 votes) Average
Bicycle tracking / Recovery (2 votes) Average
Dispersion Channels (2 votes) Average
Music Search (2 votes) Average
Personalized dolls (2 votes) Average
Erasible printing (5 votes) Strong
Missing Children Channel Plus (2 votes) Average
Pay to View Video Monitor (2 votes) Average
wireless i-pod (14 votes) Strong
Elliminating the carousel (2 votes) Average
repair ballpoint pens (6 votes) Average
Laptop check-in at Wi-Fi cafes (2 votes) Average
Universal ID (passport, DL) (5 votes) Average
Rechargable TV Remote (7 votes) Average
Ancient Greece & S. America (7 votes) Weak
Thanksgiving in October (9 votes) Average
stealth shoes (2 votes) Average
Submarine useable space (3 votes) Average
Weapons ideas (6 votes) Average
Seeing through Things (2 votes) Average
Is it OK? (5 votes) Average
centrifugal separation (2 votes) Average
sensor in public toilets (1 votes) Average
exam writer (1 votes) Average
Unify the military services (6 votes) Average
Buy Indivisual Socks (4 votes) Average
All Gum Ball Form (2 votes) Average
Soda Mix (1 votes) Average
Whiteout (1 votes) Average
Actual Movie Times (1 votes) Average
Universal Outlets (1 votes) Average
Pluto's disgrace (3 votes) Average
Roller Coaster Tram (6 votes) Strong
Airliner Building (5 votes) Average
MagLev theme-park flight (6 votes) Average
Split Ownership Mortgage (4 votes) Average
risk based capital insurance (1 votes) Average
Finger print ID gun. (2 votes) Average
aMaZiNg To0tbRush.. (3 votes) Average
Optic Nerve Signal Recording (1 votes) Average
Double scale thermometer (2 votes) Average
Anti-Airplaine Hijacking (6 votes) Average
abductions (1 votes) Average
The Alarm Lock (1 votes) Average
frequen flyer securityFreepass (5 votes) Weak
Stun Gun on Wild Animals (4 votes) Average
Longtime farming fertilization (1 votes) Average
Dot flasher (1 votes) Average
Lost luggage at the airport (2 votes) Average
More Hand Dryers (3 votes) Average
yardsale.com (3 votes) Average
Book (4 votes) Average
more efficient calendar (2 votes) Average
Self-Cooling Bullets (1 votes) Average
Aquarium Sub Cam (9 votes) Strong
Daylight savings without tears (7 votes) Weak
Time direction in a multiverse (1 votes) Average
Book title readout (4 votes) Weak
Long Term Care Insurance (1 votes) Average
A Starry Night, for once (6 votes) Strong
Coordinated CC Due Date (1 votes) Average
randomizing start of alphabet (13 votes) Average
Convertible buildings (3 votes) Average
Aquarium Subs (8 votes) Strong
Knee Defender (3 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

That would mean 10 conveyor belts for each Flight coming in. There would need to be a complete redesign of the system which would be extraordinarily expensive. However, if the baggage were sorted before coming out onto the belt and stacked efficiently then the conveyor would bring the luggage out in a numbered sequence. Passengers could get in line by number and as they walked up they could directly retrieve their baggage. Sorting passengers would be as simple as putting numbers on the handrails of a walkway.
The problem with this scenario is that when baggage is late, passengers may have to stand in line for a while until the baggage arrives.

Passengers arriving late or not wanting to stand in line could walk over to the end of the conveyor and wait for the baggage to be set off onto the floor.

The end of the conveyor could be colocated with the "lost baggage" office to save the airport personnel from extra labor.

Yes, there are many different systems possible that would be better than the crazy carousel. The system I described might not be the best one, but then every system will have some drawbacks. Junk, I'm not quite sure what you mean in the system you described. Are you saying that the passengers would be in a line along side a long belt that brings the bags to everyone at once, or are you saying the belt would give the bags to the passengers one at a time, but in a preselected order?

Dwane Anderson, Feb 10 2007