WhyNot?

Witness Pay

Category: Communities
Responses: 5 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 4 in opposition)
Number of views: 364
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Weak WeakYour Rating:

This idea is for insurance companies to only pay for accidents in which a verified witness actually saw the accident happen. This is sort of what is happening in Mississippi post-Hurricane Katrina.

twim23, Feb 12 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Communities):

Comments from other members:

Add your comment

So you're saying that if some dumass hits my car on the street and keeps going (never caught)that I have to pay the thousands of dollars to fix the damage because no one was there in the middle of the night to see them do it? What if a tree falls on the car and nobody sees it happen?

I mention these two scenarios because both have happened to me. I pay insurance premiums that covered both of these events. And I was happy I had that coverage.

Hyenuf, Feb 12 2007