Navigation | ||
My WhyNot? | ||
Icon Key | ||||||||||||
The community's level of support for this idea is...
| ||||||||||||
MIA MEMORY IN AIR | |||||||||||||||||
If data in bits and bytes stored in magnetic disks can be transmitted wirelessly using 802.11 standard, why cant data be stored in say IBM D/BLUE in SFO/UNDER GGB then US Marines In-Service/Out-Post in Iraq/Kuwait./Doha-=| can use the data from Central Repository / CR recallable at will (RAW) thus lighten the load for US marines carrying Panasonic Toughbooks accessing the net from Middle Eastern Conditions (MEC)?
marun, Mar 07 2007
What do you think of this idea or comment?
| |||||||||||||||||
I agree
No opinion
I disagree
Add your comment
Fundamentaly you are getting at local storage vs remote storage.
There are numerous reasons to go for one or the other.
For local storage, your data will be there, secure, (supposing your computer doesn't get stolen, lost, or destroyed). Low value data need not clog the network.Should the network connection break or not be available, you will have your data.
For remote data storage, it cannot generally be stolen form a scure data centre, and the data can be monitored by higher ups to see how things are going.
You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about. The real question is, why doesn't this post involve radium?
Your ideas are getting harder and harder to make out. We don't need acronyms or super-specific details. Give us the meat.