WhyNot?

Double-lock democracy

Category: Politics
Responses: 3 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 2 in opposition)
Number of views: 345
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Weak WeakYour Rating:

Politicians face increasing scepticism from the public. The old categories of left and right still exist, but many MPs (in the UK) try to hide the true nature of their policies by disguising them as a 'Third Way' between capitalism and social justice. There is a good reason for this. Elections are won on the middle ground, and politicians naturally want to appeal to the maximum number of voters. However, the law of unintended consequences results in electors being put off by the 'spin' and losing trust in politicians as those from the left say one thing and do another while those from the right feel they have to deny their natural tax-cutting instincts so as not to sound too 'extreme'.

Why not restore a little trust? A party from left or right could simply assure voters: we will only implement measures both you and we believe in. This 'double lock' means bills would have to be supported by more than half the electorate and also more than half the party before a first reading. A number of positive consequences should follow:

1) 'unpopular' laws would no longer be passed

2) the leader of a party could no longer act against the beliefs of the rank-and-file (the 'back-benchers' in the UK)

3) politicians would no longer have the same incentive to pretend to be something they're not

4) voters would go to the polls knowing that they could still elect the party that was on balance the better option but had certain extreme views, safe in the knowledge that they held a veto over any unpopular measures (such as privatising the state-run National Health Service)

5) politicians would also enjoy the same benefit while voting in any leadership election, since they would also hold a policy veto

nicholas_dale, Mar 22 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Other ideas in category (Politics):

Domestic oil drilling option (3 votes) Weak
Ending the war on drugs (187 votes) Very strong
welfare vs illegal (5 votes) Average
Goals, not time-US out of Iraq (1 votes) Average
Move Hunter College (3 votes) Average
Vote against incumbent (2 votes) Average
Shorter Election, no Incumbent (3 votes) Average
Bring your kids to vote! (4 votes) Average
no need to vote (6 votes) Weak
Voting franchise for children (4 votes) Average
drug test for welfare (17 votes) Average
Issue Card (2 votes) Average
the free solution to terror (5 votes) Weak
Gun Toting... Liberals? (17 votes) Strong
increasing oil prices (8 votes) Weak
Election securitization (2 votes) Average
WHAT Causing The Housing Meltd (1 votes) Average
Multi-party system (8 votes) Average
Open Source Government (3 votes) Average
Voluntary Government (11 votes) Very weak
One year trial (3 votes) Weak
Immigration Control (4 votes) Average
New American Flag (14 votes) Very weak
United countries of World(2) (4 votes) Average
Starting a new country (9 votes) Average
War on Terror (5 votes) Weak
True Democracy (10 votes) Weak
A dirty affair (8 votes) Weak
Politicians and the solution (5 votes) Weak
Alternatives to queueing--Iraq (3 votes) Average
United Countries of Earth (8 votes) Weak
Censor the media (13 votes) Very weak
Peace In The Middle East (9 votes) Weak
Mental Illness in Politics (3 votes) Weak
Negative Voting (7 votes) Weak
Vote Out (1 votes) Average
Eric Muller For President (4 votes) Weak
Double-lock democracy (3 votes) Weak
HUGE needle (25 votes) Very weak
Internet Voting (4 votes) Average
A Standard Scale for Politics (6 votes) Average
Immigration and The Military (7 votes) Average
Campaign Funds (2 votes) Average
International Economy (6 votes) Weak
*For-Profit Prison Education (12 votes) Strong
Adopt a Country (4 votes) Average
Better Voting Machine (4 votes) Average
Centrist party (11 votes) Strong
AidMarket (2 votes) Average
Immigration business (2 votes) Average
Ultra Marines / Russian Navy (3 votes) Weak
Divide and Rule (3 votes) Average
Intention Taxing (1 votes) Average
Social venture Tax Change (1 votes) Average
Show the Budget (1 votes) Average
IPDB (4 votes) Average
Special Interest Disarmament (3 votes) Average
Trace Federal Budget (3 votes) Average
Legislative Pay (4 votes) Weak
Incentives For Politicians (3 votes) Weak
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Leaders are supposes to lead. WIth no other job, they are supposed to figure out all the details and make good, sometimes unpopular decisions.

Pure democracy is three wolves and 1 sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

The core concept, that POPULAR means GOOD, is flawed.

wizard61, Mar 30 2007

How about just eliminate all political corruption:Elected doctors of science to ethically manage and develop the National Security Agency

jamesbdunn, Jun 16 2007