WhyNot?

No power consuming standby

Category: Gadgets/Appliances/Electronics
Responses: 2 (1 in support, 1 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 899
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

What do you think about my patented idea ?Standby consumption of electric appliances (TV, HiFi, etc.) is not indifferent, in particular over longer periods of time. Environment and energy losses issues are also a problem.Why not power the switching on circuitry of the electric appliance from the remote controller via wireless power beaming so that the electric appliances can be switched completely off ?The required energy to switch a TV on is minimal and can be provided by the remote controller directly (via laser or microvawe tecniques), so that the electric appliance does not require to be in a standby power consuming status.

Charlie2, Apr 02 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Gadgets/Appliances/Electronics):

Cell-phone all in one remote (1 votes) Average
Conserve Clothes Dryer Heat (3 votes) Average
RFID pet collar (4 votes) Average
Remote Control Finder (16 votes) Very strong
Remote Control Finder (1 votes) Average
Finding stuff (6 votes) Strong
Fridge handle (1 votes) Average
High efficiency dryer (1 votes) Average
Washer/Dryer in one appliance! (5 votes) Average
Bluetooth Remote Control (13 votes) Strong
Hot Water Recirculator (9 votes) Weak
Auto-Stop for Clothes Dryer (1 votes) Average
No More Wires (11 votes) Very strong
MP3 Door Bell (13 votes) Very strong
Door locks (37 votes) Very strong
Self Testing Fire Alarm (3 votes) Average
Only Light Off Switch (4 votes) Average
Auto-off AC/DC converter (2 votes) Average
Best Air Conditioner Invention (1 votes) Average
Network laundry room (6 votes) Strong
Auto-closing garage door... (7 votes) Strong
RFID Writer for Home Use (3 votes) Average
A fan that really works (2 votes) Average
Remote Residencial Doorlock (2 votes) Average
Home planetarium (4 votes) Average
PDA Wireless Home Intercom (4 votes) Average
Disabling applicance clocks (8 votes) Average
Smart Key for your home (2 votes) Average
Secure drop box for packages (8 votes) Strong
No power consuming standby (2 votes) Average
Wireless Personal Thermostat (1 votes) Average
Wi-Fi Designer Appliance (4 votes) Average
A Smart Phone (3 votes) Average
Coffee Alarm (5 votes) Strong
Keyless House Door Entry (8 votes) Strong
RFID book storage (2 votes) Average
Music Management/Storage (3 votes) Average
'Ollie North' Mailbox (3 votes) Average
Sewing in more than one direct (2 votes) Average
automatic burner (5 votes) Weak
progammable sunrise lights (3 votes) Average
Mobile text2speech scanner (2 votes) Average
remotely setting the video (1 votes) Average
Remote cntrol w/voice recorder (2 votes) Average
battery operated floor brush (1 votes) Average
Domino organizer (1 votes) Average
Front Door VoiceMail/Greeting (8 votes) Strong
In-wall moisture sensors (4 votes) Average
Share TiVo recordings (3 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Wirelessly beaming power would lose more energy than gets spent by ordinary standby circuitry, to transmit enough to power the standby circuitry of a device to activate it. Not to mention the added complexity in the remote and device, and bigger batteries which themselves need charged, or replaced, and a monetary and perhaps enviromental cost likely more than utility power.

The most logical thing to do would be to have hard power off switches on appliances, and teach people to use them.

classicsat, Apr 02 2007

Classicsat, I'm sure the standby power requirements of some appliances is quite low and not of too much concern. But the idea of beaming power to intiate a circuit response in something that is completely powered down. I think a circuit similar to an RFID could perform that function. Though I don't know how much power the transceiver for an RFID uses. I know some have a range out to about 600 feet.

jamesbdunn, Jun 16 2007