WhyNot?

atom_perputal motion?

Category: Energy
Responses: 2 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 1 in opposition)
Number of views: 1446
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

according to current laws of physics that a 100% efficient perpetual motion device is NOT possible. I have read reasons why. But wonder what about the "atom" it has electrons that are in perpetual motion around their nucleus. Is this not natures example that it is indeed possible.

energydude, Nov 02 2007

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Energy):

Control Your Home Energy Costs (2 votes) Average
Solar Panels on Wind Turbins (7 votes) Average
Energy Usage Meter in Kitchen (3 votes) Average
Reduce your electricity bill (13 votes) Strong
Hydrgogen Peroxide Car (4 votes) Average
HOA Shared E-Utility Grid (1 votes) Average
Piezo-Electric Generator (8 votes) Average
River Turbine for Camping (2 votes) Average
Use Roadways to Produce Energy (12 votes) Average
Free Solar Panels (4 votes) Average
light bulbs (1 votes) Average
Teach stick-shift driving (4 votes) Average
Heat sensitive paint and glass (1 votes) Average
solar and wind (2 votes) Average
Useful workout (7 votes) Strong
water faucet energy (7 votes) Weak
Capture wind from Cars (5 votes) Weak
Stirling engine personal coole (2 votes) Average
Efficient Escalators (17 votes) Very strong
A 14 year old's idea (3 votes) Average
Lightning as an energy source (2 votes) Average
Small scale solar (17 votes) Very strong
Near Sun Power Generation (2 votes) Average
Terain Aware Cruise Control (3 votes) Average
Air conditioning heat exchange (2 votes) Average
Electric eels (8 votes) Very weak
Anti gas-guzzler incentives (13 votes) Average
Natural Gas as Fuel for Cars (8 votes) Strong
Electricity from lightning? (26 votes) Very strong
Home energy generators (3 votes) Average
Volcano energy (2 votes) Average
Crazy renewable energy idea (12 votes) Average
gym energy recapture (18 votes) Very strong
Generate electricity at spas (18 votes) Very strong
Save money while keeping fit (1 votes) Average
Solar panels in desert (6 votes) Strong
Losing weight to save Earth (3 votes) Average
solar powered steam generator (0 votes) Very weak
free energy (7 votes) Weak
atom_perputal motion? (2 votes) Average
solar power (3 votes) Average
free energy aireo electricity (3 votes) Weak
human power (4 votes) Average
heat to electricity (3 votes) Average
stand alone living(100 %) (1 votes) Average
Convert Electromagnetic to Ele (1 votes) Average
stand-by power waste and Sun (1 votes) Average
renewable energy (1 votes) Average
light poles to produce energy (3 votes) Average
Light my fire (1 votes) Average
Regenerating Energy (11 votes) Average
Waterway produced Energy (1 votes) Average
Solar Panels in HT ROW (1 votes) Average
Self recharging battery (1 votes) Average
Energy generating using siphon (1 votes) Average
Low drag trailer (1 votes) Average
Solar Panels on Schools (4 votes) Average
Elec Car Powers House (2 votes) Average
Nix Office Energy Waste (1 votes) Average
Photovoltaic Tree (2 votes) Average
Kyoto Alternative (6 votes) Average
Energy revisited (5 votes) Strong
wind turbines and bats (3 votes) Average
Toilet Generator (5 votes) Weak
Wnd Turbine on Trns line tower (2 votes) Average
Solar Power Generator (6 votes) Average
Energy through Exercise (6 votes) Average
Ultimate energy- Antimatter (4 votes) Weak
More and Thicker Power Lines (4 votes) Average
the adams mote =free energy?? (3 votes) Weak
magnets=free energy?? (3 votes) Weak
Lift weight using less energy. (3 votes) Average
improving refrigeration (10 votes) Strong
A Breath of Fresh Air (4 votes) Average
fiberoptic lighting (3 votes) Average
Solar Energy Plantation (19 votes) Very strong
Wind Buildings (8 votes) Strong
watt-a-bong (2 votes) Average
Pumped storage thermal energy (1 votes) Average
Stack-able Farming (3 votes) Average
Energy Project Investment Fund (3 votes) Average
Electricity from lightning (3 votes) Average
Fuel Cells (11 votes) Average
Fuel Cell (4 votes) Average
Cable Station with Battery (2 votes) Average
Galt's powerplant (2 votes) Average
using wasted heat to cook (4 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

The universe will end

sand, Nov 02 2007

This from the same person who claimed in another post that the moon orbiting the earth is evidence of perpetual motion.

You haven't grasped the idea that just because it won't end in your puny lifespan it won't someday end? Next thing you know you will be trying to harness the "perpetual motion" of the Bobbin' Robin.

Pilsner, Nov 02 2007

What good is perpetual motion anyway? We want something that produces more energy than it consumes. Devices designed to run forever are scams perpetrated by con artists.

jasherm, Nov 03 2007

No because at the atomic level there is no resistance for the electron to encounter. Remember it's not traveling through air, the electron is traveling through nothing and as such will continue moving until acted upon.

texast, Sep 26 2008

The closest thing to free energy that we'll see in our lifetimes is fusion. They still have yet to pass the net gain of energy threshold yet but, the new ITER reactor collaboration between many countries that is being built in Europe right now, has the possibility of working within our lifetimes.

artZ, Oct 01 2008

Also , since space - time "seems" to be expanding , the distance between the atom's core and it's surrounding electron cloud is increasing ... hence the electron's orbital size is increasing.

chef, Oct 02 2008

Chef, if the atom is "expanding" at the same rate as the rest of the universe, then the "expanded" atom will still be the same size compared to the universe. Thus, it won't look any larger. I've always thought the whole "space itself expanding" theory is a little suspect. If everything in the universe, including space itself, is expanding, then what is it expanding relative to? As far as I can tell, it could only be expanding relative to the speed of light. If so, then it would be arguable that, rather than the speed of light being constant and space expanding, you could say that space is constant and the speed of light is decreasing!

Dwane Anderson, Oct 04 2008