They're scrapping the seariver med (nee exxon valdez).They'll either ditch it or scrap it for less than a couple million I bet.The cost of cleaning old tankers is often so high they often aren't even recycled, just ditched. The valdez' tanks could be simply plated over with new steel and made livable.All single-hulls are illegal now.We were thinking of making a touring seasteading school teaching sustainability technologies and much more. To be docked seasonally at a home port in iceland or finland, where the long days get you REALLY big broccoli etc. Kind've an eco tourism thing. Who wouldn't want to go on the valdez and see a robotic greenhouse? It's daytime in the tropics in the greenhouse, nevermind the week long nights. Look at te giant mangoes and olives! Iceland loves this kind of thing.The conversion would feature a hydroponic greenhouse, cistern, limited livestock, windmills, biodeisel lab, kitesails etc... All about sustainability.Hopefully we can just have it delivered to international waters without any concerns. Are there any international laws to impede this?Do I need to be or hire a skipper, and is it the same outside the 12 mile?Would a sail conversion like the dynarig or kites be able to move it, say 2-4 knots? We'd don't need to move fast unless it's important Exxon probly won't sell it to "hippies", but ti is important to point out that the valdez need not be hated, and many love her. We could be oponents to greenpeace who want it off the seas in the name of decency, I don't feel hat way. Blame the drunk, not the boat. Perhaps exxon won't hate on us.Failing that, if the right hull can be found and we get positive response from a scandinavian city, perhaps another scrap tanker can do, though the value-added sentiment of the valdez could really push this.Maybe this world just aint wonderful enough for it to ever happen.
Add your comment
Sounds like you're proposing to make a tourism-ship out of a rusty-wrecked/patched hulk that was designed for another purpose. I suspect it would be far easier to make a cruise ship from scratch than from conversion. And it would be a better cruise ship. It was made in 1986, so it's not new.
Also, it'll need to be able to move fast enough to get away from real weather in order to keep your tourists safe, so I think you'll still need a significant propulsion system, even if you can do it with wind. 2-4 knots doesn't sound very safe to me.
Naw, it's not junk, just single hulled and therefore obsolete. They put a lot into keeping it going as the med. I'd keep the engines going, just run them on used cooking oil (with proper detergents and anti-caking compounds, y'know?) The plan is to dock it most of the time, and maybe do little cruises around the area. Plus I don't think a ship this size needs to run fom weather (tides in coastal regions yes). Tankers way older and less cared-for are still in use. Thanks for looking though.
Sounds like the ARTSHIP (formerly SS Independence), moored in San Francisco Bay. Used as a floating art gallery or something.
Sounds better than the artship to me... Way better... Artship... Artship... eech... Is that where they shot "in the navy"?