WhyNot?

Election securitization

Category: Politics
Responses: 2 (1 in support, 1 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 280
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

This proposal would establish a formal market for investing in, and betting on, election results and around the world. Companies are often exposed to substantial political risk because of the potential for regime change. This market would enable companies to hedge their exposure to the potential installation of governments who may refuse to honor contracts signed with previous governments, impose confiscatory taxes, etc.The regulations establishing and governing the adminstration of the exchange would require that records could be exposed to the public in the event of allegations of corporate foul play or meddling in elections; nevertheless, incentives already exist for corporations to engage in such actions, and it does not appear that, on balance, this exchange would increase such incentives.

dgoldman, Jan 25 2008

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Other ideas in category (Politics):

Ending the war on drugs (187 votes) Very strong
welfare vs illegal (5 votes) Average
Goals, not time-US out of Iraq (1 votes) Average
Move Hunter College (3 votes) Average
Vote against incumbent (2 votes) Average
Shorter Election, no Incumbent (3 votes) Average
Bring your kids to vote! (4 votes) Average
no need to vote (6 votes) Weak
Voting franchise for children (4 votes) Average
drug test for welfare (17 votes) Average
Issue Card (2 votes) Average
the free solution to terror (5 votes) Weak
Gun Toting... Liberals? (16 votes) Strong
increasing oil prices (8 votes) Weak
Election securitization (2 votes) Average
WHAT Causing The Housing Meltd (1 votes) Average
Multi-party system (8 votes) Average
Open Source Government (3 votes) Average
Voluntary Government (11 votes) Very weak
One year trial (3 votes) Weak
Immigration Control (4 votes) Average
New American Flag (14 votes) Very weak
United countries of World(2) (4 votes) Average
Starting a new country (9 votes) Average
War on Terror (5 votes) Weak
True Democracy (10 votes) Weak
A dirty affair (8 votes) Weak
Politicians and the solution (5 votes) Weak
Alternatives to queueing--Iraq (3 votes) Average
United Countries of Earth (8 votes) Weak
Censor the media (13 votes) Very weak
Peace In The Middle East (9 votes) Weak
Mental Illness in Politics (3 votes) Weak
Negative Voting (7 votes) Weak
Vote Out (1 votes) Average
Eric Muller For President (4 votes) Weak
Double-lock democracy (3 votes) Weak
HUGE needle (25 votes) Very weak
Internet Voting (4 votes) Average
A Standard Scale for Politics (6 votes) Average
Immigration and The Military (7 votes) Average
Campaign Funds (2 votes) Average
International Economy (6 votes) Weak
*For-Profit Prison Education (12 votes) Strong
Adopt a Country (4 votes) Average
Better Voting Machine (4 votes) Average
Centrist party (11 votes) Strong
AidMarket (2 votes) Average
Immigration business (2 votes) Average
Ultra Marines / Russian Navy (3 votes) Weak
Divide and Rule (3 votes) Average
Intention Taxing (1 votes) Average
Social venture Tax Change (1 votes) Average
Show the Budget (1 votes) Average
IPDB (4 votes) Average
Special Interest Disarmament (3 votes) Average
Trace Federal Budget (3 votes) Average
Legislative Pay (4 votes) Weak
Incentives For Politicians (3 votes) Weak
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

That's why they have lobbyists.

Belmont, Jan 25 2008