WhyNot?

Comment Organizer

Category: Upgrade Features
Responses: 1 (0 in support, 1 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 287
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

Readers submit a \\"review\\" instead of a comment. The review could be more like questionnaire-style radio buttons than the current comment column. Follow this with the option to add a \\"question\\" to the questionnaire, each addition (feature, implication, application, or whatever) with it\\'s own 5 options. (agree, disagree, etc.) After this comes the box for \\"additional comments\\". Keyword, additional.

Radio buttons are quick, so, especially from the people who just browse, I think this would actually get more, rather than less feedback.

University of Jim, Apr 20 2008

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Other ideas in category (Upgrade Features):

two-function umbrella (1 votes) Average
Browser-tab icon for WhyNot? (2 votes) Average
A (4 votes) Average
Catagories (3 votes) Average
Screennames (3 votes) Average
Old Idea Deletion (4 votes) Average
Editing (3 votes) Average
Funny category (2 votes) Average
Most discussed (2 votes) Average
My favourite (2 votes) Average
Pre-loaded iPod (6 votes) Strong
Center Submit Button (1 votes) Average
Who's On-line ? (5 votes) Average
Red/Green for idea tracking (1 votes) Average
Don\'t email user\'s own comment (1 votes) Average
fictional story category (4 votes) Average
Use a graphic for vote-count (1 votes) Average
Place cursor in comment box (1 votes) Average
Comment Organizer (1 votes) Average
Homonym spell-checker (16 votes) Very strong
Need Government Category (1 votes) Average
"Its Done!" option in WhyNot (3 votes) Average
WhyNot Wiki (8 votes) Strong
Unused space (2 votes) Average
"Report as Spam" Button (6 votes) Strong
More Votes & Comments (2 votes) Average
Vote terms (3 votes) Average
Comment feedback (1 votes) Average
Email updates from whynot.net (3 votes) Average
RSS Feed for WhyNot.net (1 votes) Average
Spell Check (7 votes) Average
WhyNot pages Counter (2 votes) Average
Provide Voted Priority (4 votes) Average
Option to Hide Previous Viewed (2 votes) Average
Look List (3 votes) Average
Book on CD (1 votes) Average
Rejected idea (2 votes) Average
Doodle design (3 votes) Average
Commercial Free TV (3 votes) Average
Delete Ideas (2 votes) Average
Site communication (2 votes) Average
Latest layout (2 votes) Average
Users who hated this idea also (4 votes) Average
Make All Text Sizes Relative (3 votes) Average
Page size (3 votes) Average
additional html tag (1 votes) Average
WhyNot Corporate/Non-Profit (3 votes) Average
VerticalJavascriptCategoryNav (1 votes) Average
No More Secrets (1 votes) Average
Order of Ideas (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Comment problem (1 = no problem, 5 = big problem)

Radio buttons (1 = no annoyance, 5 = big annoyance)

University of Jim, Apr 20 2008

I expect the goal you're seeking is to get more people to weigh-in on the ideas rather than only listening to the people who are willing to comment. They absolutely should not eliminate the current comment area--that's the most interesting part of this website.

I personally believe that the three-thumb options at the bottom of the idea are nice and simple, but I don't understand why people still won't use them. I see your 'radio button' option as essentially being a five-thumb option. Maybe okay, but not really such a big change.

Maybe instead of or along-with your radio button option, the creators of this site should make a pick-of-a-thunb mandatory before viewing the next idea?"No opinion" would still be an option, but this way there would be a larger count for all ideas.

hrench, Apr 21 2008