Navigation | ||
My WhyNot? | ||
Icon Key | ||||||||||||
The community's level of support for this idea is...
| ||||||||||||
id recognition system thru eye | |||||||||||||||||
i think there must be a standard system of id recognition of humans,, it can be done thru eyes.. maitaining a complete database of that person.. no need of ne eye card.. no need of licence.. no need of bank account even,... jus show ur eye.. to da eye sensor at wall mart and hv nething u lyk.. this id vl be made at tym of birth..ur profile vl be stored in databank of the world..that vl hv ur eye as ur only key...the company whr u work all all income, money accidents ..evrything vl be in ur eye!!!if u hv started making it out... jus dont forget me.. m with u buddy.
jimjimmy49, Apr 23 2008
What do you think of this idea or comment?
| |||||||||||||||||
I agree
No opinion
I disagreeUsers who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Add your comment
Your idea is good, though it's not at all new.
Eye-based biometrics are generally focused on iris recognition right now, and they're more and more common and work well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iris_recognition
Unfortunately, they can still be fooled by a really good photo of someone's iris and there's no way to guarentee the person scanned is still alive.
I'm a big proponent of biometric id.
An alternative bio-metric was proposed that uses a cell phone camera to photograph the iris and record 3D data and eye movements to assure valid recognition. Photographs won't deceive this system, no complex hardware is required, and the cell phone camera is everywhere and already developed.
Pay your way Hitch-Hiking
A cell-phone camera is still just a camera, and my own cell-phone is only 1.3 megapixel, so it wouldn't be so good for picking up the minutia that makes one iris different from another. It also needs a macro focus.
Also, the processing is huge--I assume with your cell-phone you mean that the processing and database will be availible to the phone through the network. Though this could work, it would add to the recognition time. In my own fingerprint-reader designs, we found a dedicated high-powered computer built right into the machine was the best way to crunch the numbers fast enough, then the database was availible on the network once the fingerprint was represented by a number. With unlimited sets the recognition time was still large (ten seconds) but with factors that narrowed the pool to less than 1000 (OCR read the company-name off of the truck first), a recognition time of three seconds was possible. People get antsy at anything longer than five seconds.
I can't see your cell-phone working that fast. Also, it's still taking a photo, so a photo can still deceive it.
A cell-phone photo implies varying lighting conditions--this is a critical factor in taking pictures of eyes--have you ever tried to take a picture of your iris?. I think a fixed lighting situation is the only way you could get a reliable photo. Fixed distance, fixed focus, fixed aperture.
I've also never heard taht 3D data or eye-movements are unique or helpful in identification. how?