WhyNot?

Convert Electromagnetic to Ele

Category: Energy
Responses: 1 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 1219
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

Background: There is so much of electromagnetic noise.Idea: Device a array of antenna which could trap electromagentic noise across a wide range of spectrum. Each antenna could have a phase corrector to nullify the cancellation of waves.

wht do u say?

sidmania, Jul 03 2008

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Other ideas in category (Energy):

Solar Panels on Wind Turbins (7 votes) Average
Control Your Home Energy Costs (2 votes) Average
Energy Usage Meter in Kitchen (3 votes) Average
Reduce your electricity bill (13 votes) Strong
Hydrgogen Peroxide Car (4 votes) Average
HOA Shared E-Utility Grid (1 votes) Average
Piezo-Electric Generator (8 votes) Average
River Turbine for Camping (2 votes) Average
Use Roadways to Produce Energy (12 votes) Average
Free Solar Panels (4 votes) Average
light bulbs (1 votes) Average
Teach stick-shift driving (4 votes) Average
Heat sensitive paint and glass (1 votes) Average
solar and wind (2 votes) Average
Useful workout (7 votes) Strong
water faucet energy (7 votes) Weak
Capture wind from Cars (5 votes) Weak
Stirling engine personal coole (2 votes) Average
Efficient Escalators (17 votes) Very strong
A 14 year old's idea (3 votes) Average
Lightning as an energy source (2 votes) Average
Small scale solar (17 votes) Very strong
Near Sun Power Generation (2 votes) Average
Terain Aware Cruise Control (3 votes) Average
Air conditioning heat exchange (2 votes) Average
Electric eels (8 votes) Very weak
Anti gas-guzzler incentives (13 votes) Average
Natural Gas as Fuel for Cars (8 votes) Strong
Electricity from lightning? (26 votes) Very strong
Home energy generators (3 votes) Average
Volcano energy (2 votes) Average
Crazy renewable energy idea (12 votes) Average
gym energy recapture (18 votes) Very strong
Generate electricity at spas (18 votes) Very strong
Save money while keeping fit (1 votes) Average
Solar panels in desert (6 votes) Strong
Losing weight to save Earth (3 votes) Average
solar powered steam generator (0 votes) Very weak
free energy (7 votes) Weak
atom_perputal motion? (2 votes) Average
solar power (3 votes) Average
free energy aireo electricity (3 votes) Weak
human power (4 votes) Average
heat to electricity (3 votes) Average
stand alone living(100 %) (1 votes) Average
Convert Electromagnetic to Ele (1 votes) Average
stand-by power waste and Sun (1 votes) Average
renewable energy (1 votes) Average
light poles to produce energy (3 votes) Average
Light my fire (1 votes) Average
Regenerating Energy (11 votes) Average
Waterway produced Energy (1 votes) Average
Solar Panels in HT ROW (1 votes) Average
Self recharging battery (1 votes) Average
Energy generating using siphon (1 votes) Average
Low drag trailer (1 votes) Average
Solar Panels on Schools (4 votes) Average
Elec Car Powers House (2 votes) Average
Nix Office Energy Waste (1 votes) Average
Photovoltaic Tree (2 votes) Average
Kyoto Alternative (6 votes) Average
Energy revisited (5 votes) Strong
wind turbines and bats (3 votes) Average
Toilet Generator (5 votes) Weak
Wnd Turbine on Trns line tower (2 votes) Average
Solar Power Generator (6 votes) Average
Energy through Exercise (6 votes) Average
Ultimate energy- Antimatter (4 votes) Weak
More and Thicker Power Lines (4 votes) Average
the adams mote =free energy?? (3 votes) Weak
magnets=free energy?? (3 votes) Weak
Lift weight using less energy. (3 votes) Average
improving refrigeration (10 votes) Strong
A Breath of Fresh Air (4 votes) Average
fiberoptic lighting (3 votes) Average
Solar Energy Plantation (19 votes) Very strong
Wind Buildings (8 votes) Strong
watt-a-bong (2 votes) Average
Pumped storage thermal energy (1 votes) Average
Stack-able Farming (3 votes) Average
Energy Project Investment Fund (3 votes) Average
Electricity from lightning (3 votes) Average
Fuel Cells (11 votes) Average
Fuel Cell (4 votes) Average
Cable Station with Battery (2 votes) Average
Galt's powerplant (2 votes) Average
using wasted heat to cook (4 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

I think you mean one of these:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage

hrench, Jul 03 2008

To what end?

To collect EM radiation and use it to power things? There isn't enough density in EM radiation to collect it and use it. A PV solar panel would collect much more usable energy.

To reduce/eliminate it within your home or a room? Yes, a Faraday Cage is probably what you want.

classicsat, Jul 04 2008

I have thought of that for years since 1978the world may be getting closerlink https://inlportal.inl.gov/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=1269&mode=2&featurestory=DA_101047

tcox, Aug 26 2008

Harvesting the sun's energy with antennas

INL researcher Steven Novack holds a plastic sheet of nanoantenna arrays, created by embossing the antenna structure and depositing a conductive metal in the pattern. Each square contains roughly 260 million antennas. Nanotechnology R&D usually occurs on the centimeter scale, but this INL-patented manufacturing process demonstrates nano-scale features can be produced on a larger scale. Researchers at Idaho National Laboratory, along with partners at Microcontinuum Inc. (Cambridge, MA) and Patrick Pinhero of the University of Missouri, are developing a novel way to collect energy from the sun with a technology that could potentially cost pennies a yard, be imprinted on flexible materials and still draw energy after the sun has set.

The new approach, which garnered two 2007 Nano50 awards, uses a special manufacturing process to stamp tiny square spirals of conducting metal onto a sheet of plastic. Each interlocking spiral "nanoantenna" is as wide as 1/25 the diameter of a human hair.

Because of their size, the nanoantennas absorb energy in the infrared part of the spectrum, just outside the range of what is visible to the eye. The sun radiates a lot of infrared energy, some of which is soaked up by the earth and later released as radiation for hours after sunset. Nanoantennas can take in energy from both sunlight and the earth's heat, with higher efficiency than conventional solar cells.

"I think these antennas really have the potential to replace traditional solar panels," says physicist Steven Novack, who spoke about the technology in November at the National Nano Engineering Conference in Boston.

Taking antennas to the atomic level The miniscule circuits absorb energy just like the antenna on your television or in your cell phone. All antennas work by resonance, the same self-reinforcing physical phenomenon that allows a high note to shatter glass. Radio and television antennas must be large because of the wavelength of energy they need to pick up. In theory, making antennas that can absorb electromagnetic radiation closer to what we can see is simple: just engineer a smaller antenna.

An array of nanoantennas, printed in gold and imaged with a scanning electron microscope. The deposited wire is roughly a thousand atoms thick. A flexible panel of interconnected nanoantennas may one day replace heavy, expensive solar panels. But finding an efficient way to stamp out arrays of atom-scale spirals took a number of years. "It's not that this concept is new," Novack says, "but the boom in nanotechnology is what has really made this possible." The INL team envisions the antennas might one day be produced like foil or plastic wrap on roll-to-roll machinery. So far, they have demonstrated the imprinting process with six-inch circular stamps, each holding more than 10 million antennas.

It wasn't immediately obvious the structures might be used for solar power. At first, the researchers considered pairing the antennas with conventional solar cells to make them more efficient. "Then we thought to start from scratch," Novack says. "We realized we could make the antennas into their own energy harvesters."

An economical alternative Commercial solar panels usually transform less that 20 percent of the usable energy that strikes them into electricity. Each cell is made of silicon and doped with exotic elements to boost its efficiency. "The supply of processed silicon is lagging, and they only get more expensive," Novack says. He hopes solar nanoantennas will be a more efficient and sustainable alternative.

The team estimates individual nanoantennas can absorb close to 80 percent of the available energy. The circuits themselves can be made of a number of different conducting metals, and the nanoantennas can be printed on thin, flexible materials like polyethylene, a plastic that's commonly used in bags and plastic wrap. In fact, the team first printed antennas on plastic bags used to deliver the Wall Street Journal, because they had just the right thickness.

By focusing on readily available materials and rapid manufacturing from inception, Novack says, the aim is to make nanoantenna arrays as cheap as inexpensive carpet.

Fine-tuning fine structures The real trick to making the solar nanoantenna panels is to be able to predict their properties and perfect their design before printing them in the factory. While it is relatively easy to work out the physics of one resonating antenna, complex interactions start to happen when multiple antennas are combined. When hit with the right frequency of infrared light, the antennas also produce high-energy electromagnetic fields that can have unexpected effects on the materials.

So the researchers are developing a computer model of resonance in the tiny structures, looking for ways to fine-tune the efficiency of an entire array by changing factors like materials and antenna shape. "The ability to model these antennas is what's going to make us successful, because we can't see these things," Novack says. "They're hard to manipulate, and small tweaks are going to make big differences."

INL researchers Dale Kotter (left), Steven Novack, and Judy Partin are developing flexible plastic sheets of nanoantennas to collect solar energy. A charged future One day, Novack says, these nanoantenna collectors might charge portable battery packs, coat the roofs of homes and, perhaps, even be integrated into polyester fabric. Double-sided panels could absorb a broad spectrum of energy from the sun during the day, while the other side might be designed to take in the narrow frequency of energy produced from the earth's radiated heat.

While the nanoantennas are easily manufactured, a crucial part of the process has yet to be fully developed: creating a way to store or transmit the electricity. Although infrared rays create an alternating current in the nanoantenna, the frequency of the current switches back and forth ten thousand billion times a second. That's much too fast for electrical appliances, which operate on currents that oscillate only 60 times a second. So the team is exploring ways to slow that cycling down, possibly by embedding energy conversion devices like tiny capacitors directly into the antenna structure as part of the nanoantenna imprinting process.

"At this point, these antennas are good at capturing energy, but they're not very good at converting it," says INL engineer Dale Kotter, "but we have very promising exploratory research under way." Kotter and Novack are also exploring ways to transform the high-frequency alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) that can be stored in batteries. One potential candidate is high-speed rectifiers, special diodes that would sit at the center of each spiral antenna and convert the electricity from AC to DC. The team has a patent pending on a variety of potential energy conversion methods. They anticipate they are only a few years away from creating the next generation of solar energy collectors.

tcox, Aug 26 2008