Outboard motor shroud | |||||||||||||||||
A lot of damage is done to wildlife by the exposed blades of an outboard motor. It should be illegal for the blades to be exposed. And it might make for a more efficient system if a tube shroud enclosed the spinning blades which might have less probability of tangling with underwater plant growth.
sand, Jul 22 2008
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add your comment
What if the "tube shroud enclosed the spinning blades" gets stuck with wildlife? I think the Idea is good but do they realy kill so much plants and fish? (Just asking, I don't know)
Of course everyone that has a jet-boat or a PWC already knows the advantages of the enclosed prop. I suppose in a low-speed situation where you want less turbulance/noise (like trolling) it's worse to duct or jet the motor, but generally, a jetprop is better anyway. But just like a ducted propeller in the sky, they increase efficiency to a point, but after the sweet-spot, they are less efficient. And jets (not ducts) are easily damaged by sand or gravel.
I'm sort-of surprised that normally not-political sand is saying 'there ought to be a law'--a State Law? A US law? A Finland law? a UN law? Does it just apply to new boats, or are we going to make poor Otis with his 1956 Evinrude retrofit? I prefer voluntary movement toward conservation based on knowledge--not laws.