Hi,

I came across a couple of ideas in a series of books by David Eddings, collectively known as The Tamuli. I've described them below, but was wondering if any organization, political/ corporate/etc. had ever implemented it (I mean, was it sheer genius, a la "Why Not?" or was it inspired by something else?)

1. The electoral system in one of the nation's states is basically democratic, with a twist. Nobody wants to nominate themselves as candidates for the head of government because the moment they're nominated, all their assets are seized and transferred to the government. If they are not elected, their assets are returned. If they do become the head of the government, since their assets are public, its in the best interests of the unfortunate fellow to make sure the economy does well, otherwise he loses a lot of money!

2. The problem with malcontents is that they think they know how to do things better than incumbent governments. So instead of allowing the firebrands to run amok, the government says something along the lines of: Well, if you think you can run things better, go ahead and show us. That way, the government is seen as sympathetic & listening, and the malcontent effectively switches sides!

Thanks

Axe

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

I agree

No opinion

I disagree