WhyNot?

Luggage carts not carousel

Category: Airline Industry
Responses: 2 (2 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 919
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

I've always wondered why the airlines couldn't just bring the cart from the plane into the baggage-claim area, instead of putting it on a carousel.

Currently, they handle your luggage two times when they could simply bring the luggage carts--as they were unloaded from the plane--directly into the building as they are. I suggest it be pulled to an automated 'track' that would immediately bring the luggage-wagons into the building, to the correct baggage claim area.

This way, the luggage would make it from the plane back to the travelers much more quickly. It would only be handled while leaving the plane, so fewer employees would be needed. Baggage carousels break and damage luggage--with this system, your bags would sit nicely in the cart without piling or rolling or jamming.

You would probably want to make the carts longer, lower and more narrow so when they reached the baggage claim, the bags would be easier for customers to pick-up.

Luggage that needs to change planes could (still) be put on different carts that wouldn't be brought into the baggage claim area--no change here.

Although I prefer it, they wouldn't have to use automated pull-cables in the floor of the building to move the carts--they could use the outdoor-tractor to pull if it was electric. Either way, this seems quicker, cheaper and simpler than what they do now.

You'll need dedicated 'roads' for the carts (and tractor) in the baggage claim area, but that's what the carousel is like anyway. If you're afraid the carts would be dirty or snowy, you could design these 'roads' to only expose the bay of the cart, hiding the wheels.

This seems like such a simple idea to me. I don't fly that much and I seldom check luggage, so I'm no expert, but I'm sure some of you can evaluate this and tell me if I'm cracked.

hrench, Aug 13 2008

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Airline Industry):

Aerial pictures in flight (218 votes) Very strong
Bumpee discount option (2 votes) Average
Airplane tires (12 votes) Strong
Carry on all your suitcases (17 votes) Very weak
rental video games and console (4 votes) Average
Finding airline black boxes (2 votes) Average
More Leg Room on the Plane (2 votes) Average
Disable Reclining Airline Seat (22 votes) Average
Party Blimp (6 votes) Average
NTN (Buzztime) Trivia InFlight (2 votes) Average
Luggage carts not carousel (2 votes) Average
Swivel seats in Coach (11 votes) Average
Publish Check-in Waiting Times (5 votes) Strong
Google Maps for plane windows (2 votes) Average
Seating Sections on Airplanes (2 votes) Average
Suitcase Savior (1 votes) Average
Airliner Paracute (5 votes) Weak
KIDS (3 votes) Weak
SENIORS (3 votes) Weak
Overweight planes (19 votes) Very strong
Airline Pre-Boarding (4 votes) Weak
Body Mass Index ticket price (23 votes) Average
Solve plane crashes quickly (10 votes) Average
sleeper seats -- intl. coach (11 votes) Strong
Luggage priority (7 votes) Strong
better plane entry order (4 votes) Average
Sell leg room for money (5 votes) Average
Use two doors to load plane (1 votes) Average
pocket knife checkin (7 votes) Strong
Better way to collect baggage (4 votes) Average
rental laptops in flight (4 votes) Average
Air GPS (3 votes) Average
Cup holders in airline seats (9 votes) Strong
Frequent Flyer miles for time (4 votes) Average
No Carry-On Flights (7 votes) Average
Seating (7 votes) Weak
Frequent Flyer Hours (4 votes) Average
Transparent Overhead Bin Lid (6 votes) Average
Quicker Airline Boarding (9 votes) Average
Passenger Screening Attendants (1 votes) Average
Fly without luggage (13 votes) Weak
Swapping flight times (3 votes) Weak
Fuel tank bladders for airline (3 votes) Weak
Airline Tour in Flight (7 votes) Strong
Deli Line for Boarding (3 votes) Weak
Airline Security (2 votes) Average
FreqFlier Standby (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

A: the inside infrastructure is set up for individual luggage, not the carrier.

B: There may be certain liability allowing the customers accessing the carrier, in injury and possible damage to other fliers luggage, to get their own.

classicsat, Aug 14 2008

classicsat, I appreciate your comment. I think I can rebutt both of your points:

A. then redesign the inside infrastructure. I'm saving thousands of people thousands of minutes and dollars by eliminating the unneeded transfer of luggage from the carts to the carousel, and I'm also eliminating the need for maintenance on the carousel. The ones in Kansas City always overload and stop half-way through the luggage of a flight. Thats's when I thought of this idea.

B. A newly designed luggage wagon could be configured to present the luggage at the same height, overreach, etc as a current carousel to preclude the risk of injury. And I already mentioned that it should be in a track so the people are protected from the wheels. As for one person damaging another person's luggage, that seems unlikely to me and could happen even now.

hrench, Aug 20 2008

I wouldn't trust the airlines to take care of my luggage. Next time I travel, I'm shipping my luggage by courier. I have a nice flight, and my stuff arrives at my door.

nayhem, Aug 25 2008