WhyNot?

Conglomerate Carriers

Category: Upgrade Features
Responses: 1 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 893
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

Air Craft Carriers should be modified such that multiple carriers can link up to form a longer runway for larger aircraft.

loWnOLF, Sep 23 2008

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

worst rated ideas (70 votes) Very strong
Precise Representation (2 votes) Average
True Democracy (15 votes) Weak

Other ideas in category (Upgrade Features):

"Ideas agreed with" misleading (1 votes) Average
how did you find this place? (2 votes) Average
List of all people support (1 votes) Average
fix the sorting on top rated (2 votes) Average
no-login ideas (2 votes) Average
Vending Machine Nightmare ... (1 votes) Average
Editing (4 votes) Average
Commercial Free TV (4 votes) Average
Spam wipeout (2 votes) Average
Comment count vs vote count (4 votes) Average
WhyNot Wiki (18 votes) Very strong
Don't email user's own comment (2 votes) Average
WN Needs ECONOMIC Category (1 votes) Average
Center Submit Button (1 votes) Average
Homonym spell-checker (17 votes) Very strong
Latest layout (3 votes) Average
Place cursor in comment box (2 votes) Average
when you vote - get a new idea (5 votes) Average
newer comments first (1 votes) Average
No More Secrets (3 votes) Weak
"Its Done!" option in WhyNot (4 votes) Average
Old Idea Deletion (5 votes) Average
Credit Card Security (2 votes) Average
flag as objectionable, spam (4 votes) Average
comment tree (3 votes) Average
Back to same place on page (2 votes) Average
Vote terms (4 votes) Average
Conglomerate Carriers (1 votes) Average
What's Meant By 'Recent'? (2 votes) Average
VerticalJavascriptCategoryNav (2 votes) Average
Rejected idea (3 votes) Average
Red/Green for idea tracking (2 votes) Average
Edit my comments (6 votes) Strong
Catagories (3 votes) Average
Screennames (3 votes) Average
Funny category (2 votes) Average
Most discussed (2 votes) Average
My favourite (2 votes) Average
Pre-loaded iPod (7 votes) Strong
Who's On-line ? (5 votes) Average
fictional story category (4 votes) Average
Use a graphic for vote-count (1 votes) Average
Comment Organizer (1 votes) Average
Need Government Category (1 votes) Average
Unused space (2 votes) Average
"Report as Spam" Button (6 votes) Strong
More Votes & Comments (2 votes) Average
Comment feedback (1 votes) Average
Email updates from whynot.net (3 votes) Average
RSS Feed for WhyNot.net (4 votes) Average
Spell Check (7 votes) Average
WhyNot pages Counter (2 votes) Average
Provide Voted Priority (4 votes) Average
Option to Hide Previous Viewed (2 votes) Average
Look List (3 votes) Average
Book on CD (3 votes) Average
Doodle design (3 votes) Average
Delete Ideas (2 votes) Average
Site communication (2 votes) Average
Users who hated this idea also (4 votes) Average
Make All Text Sizes Relative (4 votes) Average
Page size (3 votes) Average
additional html tag (1 votes) Average
WhyNot Corporate/Non-Profit (4 votes) Average
Order of Ideas (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

To line up a carrier with the wind for take-offs and landings and hold it steady in a rough sea is a very difficult task. Linking multiple carriers under normal sea conditions for proper aircraft use may well be close to impossible.

sand, Sep 23 2008

I'm not really sure of the benefit of this. If carriers weren't long enough, we could just make them longer--even a supercarrier is only 2/3 as long as the biggest supertankers. But instead, we've designed planes especially for them and it works pretty well.

There are google-videos of c-130's landing on a carrier deck, but at a certain wingspan, it become a risk that the wing will hit the superstructure. And if you're not talking about big-planes, you're probably thinking about flying an fighters (an F-15 eg) from a carrier--it could never survive the abrupt landing.

As for hooking two 1000ft ships together to make a 2000 foot runway, 2000 foot is still only a third as long as most land runways. The amount of structure you're going to need to lock these ships into one would be astonishing, even if it wasn't strong enough for heavy seas.

Then you'd have to keep the whole length of it clear to land your ground-based plane--pretty hard to fight a battle with only one plane on deck at a time.

hrench, Sep 23 2008

You may be interested in the Freedom Ship.

http://www.freedomship.com/

hrench, Sep 23 2008

Copyright © Barry Nalebuff & Ian Ayres