Hover Rings | |||||||||||||||||
Im trying to work out this possibility. I had this idea that when Electro Magnetic fields are created, a major reason why it doesn't cause lift could be because its not going anywhere. It just sits there, doing its thing. So, what if you had alternating rings that generate a higher Magnetic field as they fell down towards the Earth, and could actually push that field at the Earth, and then slide back to the top while another one slides by, and pushes another field at the Earth. It would move fast, like pistons almost. That much field being thrown at the ground would be trying to push the Earth away, which it cant cause the Earth is bigger, and instead pushes itself up and away. The more fields, the farther it gets propelled. It sounds plausible mostly. I mean, one field pushing hard on a much bigger larger field, should cause one of them to repel.
MadJay, Dec 30 2008
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add your comment
Electromagnets (or any other magnets) are not repelled by the Earth. The Earth's magnetic field is weak and magnets only repel from their poles. So you could only get an upward repulsion effect near the Earth's poles (in the arctic or antarctic) and even there it would be very weak.
Ok, so then switch up the fields from Electro Magnetic, and move it into Gravitational Fields. Since this has just become a reality, it may prove possible since it would be the solution to Einsteins field equation in general relativity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_field
Next time you generate a negative gravity field let me know. I'm all set to assemble a Buck Rogers jumping belt.
Then grab your gear and lets go!!http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/scientists_find_evidence_for_artifical_gravity_10282.htmlapparently its been done.
Aside from enclosing myself in liquid nitrogen (or liquid helium if I can't manage high temperature super conduction) I saw no reference to negative gravity.
ill accept my defeat on this one. I didnt look for negative gravity, but just a gravitational field. But it was just an idea. lol