Boat-tail pickup poptop camper | |||||||||||||||||
It seems to me that US pick-up trucks have become less aerodynamic in the last ten years. Possibly the biggest drag inducement is the open truck-bed. I'm suggesting a new shape of bed-cover that could protect the bed from the elements, secure it and help to get you better mpg. I suggest it start at the cab, shaped such that it's an aerodynamic fit--then contour both down while bringing the sides together so it ends a couple of feet past the open tailgate. Or remove the tail-gate--your call. I just mean that to get a useful aerodynamic effect, it can't be too short and should also teardrop down as well as left-right. Not too long so it would interfere if you towed a trailer. Also, it should be hinged so that it can split at the top if you need to carry something tall like a refrigerator. I've always hated that current bed-covers preclude carrying something tall. Already, many people purchase a flat-hard cover that will lift on struts or a roll-up or fold-up. In the 70s and 80s, most trucks had a 'pop-top' camper that extended from the cab --at cab height--for the full length of the bed. Both of these solutions are for protecting your 'stuff' from the elements and making the bed lockable. The newer hard-flat covers also increase your mpg. The old covers let you sleep in the back 'camping.' So my idea combines benefits of camping and security and mpg, but doesn't have the disadvantage that you can't haul tall stuff. I know that modern truck designs spend many hours in a wind-tunnel--which is why the sides of the beds have gotten taller. I suspect eventually, the manufacturers are headed to this concept anyway. Note, here's a link to a similar idea, but I would remove the tailgate and bring the sides together farther aft than that and mine would split top-center (there would be a ridge, gas struts, etc) to put tall stuff in. That would be the primary way to open mine. http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/commercially-produced-aerodynamic-pickup-bed-cap-583.html Like it?
hrench, Apr 03 2009
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © Barry Nalebuff & Ian Ayres
Add your comment
I like this idea, except that I don't think it should extend past the bumper for safety reasons. Making it too long will also make it harder to park. I don't think think it is really necessary to make the back taper all the way to the end. If I recall correctly, engineers back in the 80's concluded that a flat back at the rear of a hatchback was the optimal design aerodynamically. That's why you see so many flat backed hatchbacks now.
Dwane, there are many cars that use a 'kammback' or 'kammtail' --the quick chop-off you've refered to--and it can be more aerodynamic than a bad treatment, but really it only fools the air into thinking that there's a teardrop at higher speed and only if the whole thing has been executed perfectly. A piece of trim at the wrong position and you lose much of the effect. Crosswinds burble too.
The kammback wasn't from the 70's either, it was designed in the 1930's.
I still believe that a full boat-tail would be better and if it took removal of the bed corner, I'd still be for it. If you look at the most aero cars on ecomodder, they're still full teardrop tails. Also, if I just point to that guy's truck on ecomodder, it's his idea, not mine. I'm tryin' to be a little original here.
Here's info on the kammback.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kammback
http://homepage.mac.com/christopher.z/hobby/80-AMXitems/Information/production/KammbackStory.html