WhyNot?

LIP-C

Category: Software
Responses: 1 (1 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 290
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

This application reads lips-movements and translates into all forms of receivable content. Comments please.

Thanks,

Best,

teknet, May 07 2009

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Other ideas in category (Software):

Salty encryption (1 votes) Average
mute a web page (11 votes) Strong
Distributed set with bittorren (1 votes) Average
Text VoIP (1 votes) Average
Economics Simulation (9 votes) Strong
Invention Management Software (3 votes) Average
Attachment Notation (137 votes) Very strong
Fight Recognition Software (3 votes) Average
Make Photo Slideshow yourself (2 votes) Average
Studying leaf patterns (3 votes) Average
Encryption (3 votes) Weak
Searching for images (6 votes) Average
Compiler Security Optimization (4 votes) Average
Vector Datatype (3 votes) Weak
LIP-C (1 votes) Average
Spell checker collector (2 votes) Average
Cascading search (3 votes) Average
Software Formula for 2000 Years (3 votes) Weak
Triangular Pixels (4 votes) Average
Forwarding sent email message (5 votes) Average
Organise the Start menu (6 votes) Average
Simple Shared Key Setup (1 votes) Average
DDR-style piano software (4 votes) Average
root means suid (2 votes) Average
Scorchware (2 votes) Average
Six Degrees of Computation (2 votes) Average
X-drive ==> 2 physical drives (3 votes) Average
Fast parallel secure hashing (1 votes) Average
Standardized EULA (2 votes) Average
Description field for email (3 votes) Average
Honeypot feedback/automation (1 votes) Average
Audio bass and treble (3 votes) Average
Extension that highlights tags (1 votes) Average
Upper-lower case (2 votes) Average
New image file format (2 votes) Average
dual scroll bars (6 votes) Average
Tabbed Working (3 votes) Average
Temporary file highlight (5 votes) Strong
Better Search Engine Links (2 votes) Average
Smarter Programming (5 votes) Strong
Linux Distro for Business (2 votes) Average
File multiple rev eliminator (3 votes) Average
Mech. Design Software (2 votes) Average
Checking email addresses (3 votes) Average
Why Powerpoint? Be nonlinear (6 votes) Strong
Chat with iTunes Listeners (3 votes) Average
Ebay database (2 votes) Average
Encrypts the whole OS (2 votes) Average
Wind offset for car (3 votes) Weak
Collaborative License Rating (4 votes) Average
Multiscopic image modeler (2 votes) Average
Simple fix for posting here (1 votes) Average
Torrent-based podcasting (2 votes) Average
Browser Preloads Next Page (4 votes) Average
Officepets (3 votes) Average
Self Authentication & Decryptn (1 votes) Average
Ductile disk encryption (2 votes) Average
Printing Cost per Page (2 votes) Average
Community Font Classification (1 votes) Average
Ubiquitous virtual honeypots (7 votes) Strong
MS Outlook spouses (1 votes) Average
MS Outlook Contacts updates (1 votes) Average
One card for the wallet (12 votes) Strong
Camera as A4 Scanner (6 votes) Strong
Ogg/PCM (3 votes) Average
Keyboard equivalents (1 votes) Average
OS for visually impaired (4 votes) Average
Window Size Limiter (1 votes) Average
Print Police (1 votes) Average
MS Outlook Highlighter (1 votes) Average
Eye-Tracking Video Drivers (2 votes) Average
Linipedea (3 votes) Weak
MS Word Bookmarks & Summaries (3 votes) Average
anti-virus T-cells (2 votes) Average
savable scroll bars (2 votes) Average
save changes dialog options (3 votes) Average
Viral Marketing in Open Source (7 votes) Weak
Microsoft CD Bug Fixes (4 votes) Average
Virtual Scanner Software (5 votes) Average
Better Shrink Wrapped License (3 votes) Average
Bayesian learning for (4 votes) Average
enclosures (2 votes) Average
Chat Prog & Problem Solving (2 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

No real meat here. Probabaly a good idea that was not communicated effectively. Dunno what you are really talking about specifically.

Hennath, May 08 2009

Hennath, it seems to me to be a pretty simple idea, even if it's doable or not.

teknet wants to follow someone's lips with a camera and appropriate software and see it the computer can read their lips, like a deaf person would.

I know much study has gone into the 3d production of sounds for use in CGI people, so it's quite clear that computers can produce correct mouth and lip placement to make it look like a CGI person is talking. But can they recognize them?

I think the biggest drawback is that the computer would probably not be able to get enough data from a 2d image of a person talking--likely to recognize the speech, a computer would need a 3d scan. But again, doable. I don't know if it's valuable--right now if you want to read lips, just get a deaf person.

hrench, May 08 2009

It's doable. Sometimes we want to do something ourselves, no need a deaf person to read lips for us. :). Thanks for the contributions. Welcome criticism of all kinds.

teknet, May 08 2009