WhyNot?

New Google filter

Category: Internet
Responses: 4 (2 in support, 2 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 457
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

You know in google how you can choose strict, moderate, or no filters on your images? Well I think you should be able to choose an option where it will only display things from that category. Say you want to have a sexy type picture, but not actually be porno. You click moderate filtering, then click the box to ONLY do moderate filtering so that the pictures that would show up in strict filtering don't show up. Or, say you wanted porn. You could click no filtering, then click a box so that it does ONLY the pictures that newly show up on the no filtering option. This would save lots of time for people. Sure, it could be used for perverted reasons, but just about anything could. If someone wants to find porn they're gonna find it regardless, so that's not really the issue. This would simply make an already efficient process even more efficient in a variety of categories for a variety of people.

porkman, May 11 2009

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Internet):

Drag-n-Drop Files to Webpage (7 votes) Strong
Reverse Ebay (14 votes) Very strong
Require Porn sites to be .sex (91 votes) Very strong
New Google filter (4 votes) Average
Tech Spec Plugins (2 votes) Average
Second-hand Mkt. - Gift Cards (9 votes) Average
WhyNot Delete Function (3 votes) Average
Reverse Ebay: Want to buy XYZ (71 votes) Very strong
Filter PPC ads by language (1 votes) Average
Browser improvement (1 votes) Average
Save with meta tags (2 votes) Average
SuperWiki (5 votes) Average
advertisement web site (1 votes) Average
Scheduled outgoing gmails (2 votes) Average
Audio Websites (5 votes) Average
5kbps Local Wifi Node (1 votes) Average
Wikipedia for Original Content (1 votes) Average
Mapquest for Walkers (14 votes) Very strong
Web directions with landmarks (2 votes) Average
NerdMakeover.com (3 votes) Average
P2P over HTTPS - ISP nightmare (2 votes) Average
AgedAdvice.com (2 votes) Average
Integrate Phone and email! (1 votes) Average
My Personal Library on Amazon (8 votes) Strong
RestyleMe.com (2 votes) Average
Better Search Results (5 votes) Average
Healing Viruses (2 votes) Average
Google Porn (10 votes) Weak
face recognition search engine (2 votes) Average
Ability to Recall E-mail (5 votes) Average
automatic blog cross-posting (1 votes) Average
Directions Route Options (6 votes) Strong
GPS from Photosynth or similar (2 votes) Average
Online Biography project (1 votes) Average
IOUs on Friendster, MySpace... (3 votes) Average
Internet pornography solution. (15 votes) Very weak
Get rid of the WWW prefix (18 votes) Weak
Extra Storage Space (2 votes) Average
Animated Emoticons at Why Not (2 votes) Average
Malleable Forums (3 votes) Average
Buyers pay reverse auction fee (2 votes) Average
Map-Based Travel Guide (4 votes) Average
Version Grabbing (1 votes) Average
A truly free market (1 votes) Average
Testimonial Website for an EX (3 votes) Average
Better than outdated magazines (2 votes) Average
Electronic Signatures (4 votes) Average
Local Online Service Auctions (2 votes) Average
Porno Viewing Time Counter (4 votes) Average
Blog-ring post aggregator (3 votes) Average
Google Tune (2 votes) Average
freeBay (5 votes) Average
Tracking trains like flights (3 votes) Average
Cell connect (3 votes) Average
Tagging Audio (3 votes) Average
Kidnapping Fedex Shipments (3 votes) Average
Co-operative Broadband (4 votes) Average
Underline anchors (2 votes) Average
Ebay Eye (2 votes) Average
An Open Search engine (2 votes) Average
Grab a shovel (2 votes) Average
Mailing Lists for Any Website (0 votes) Very weak
Online Polling (2 votes) Average
One User Name & Password (3 votes) Average
Good Spam (12 votes) Very strong
Innovative Olympics (6 votes) Average
Data manager (password, addres (2 votes) Average
Why Not Navigation? (1 votes) Average
Intuitive domain name system (4 votes) Average
Ex/Import util. for del.icio.u (2 votes) Average
Postal Address Management (3 votes) Average
Fare Reduction Alert (1 votes) Average
Graphical Evolution (4 votes) Average
Multiple Home Pages (3 votes) Average
mozilla printability detection (2 votes) Average
Reading long texts in browser (3 votes) Average
Anon. Net Access (6 votes) Average
Smarter mail speller (3 votes) Average
Recursive Trackback (3 votes) Weak
Hypefilter for news feeds (2 votes) Average
Window on the World website (2 votes) Average
Audio Email (4 votes) Average
Search-in-store (2 votes) Average
Zip Codes on Location Websites (2 votes) Average
Open Packets (2 votes) Average
Date Code Web Pages (4 votes) Average
Rebay (3 votes) Average
keyboard (5 votes) Average
ISHN Numbers (1 votes) Average
Digital Pictures Archiving (1 votes) Average
More security level groups (1 votes) Average
Commity Wi-Fi meets GRID (2 votes) Average
On holiday (2 votes) Average
A Letters To The Editor site (2 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Though I like the basis of the idea, I can see two huge problems with it.

1st. Who is going to decide what is sexy & what is pornographic? I am a naturist, to me nudity has nothing to do with sexuality. I was camping at a public site once and a family called the police on a guy who was walking around with shorts & no shirt. The only way to do it would be give every person control over what they find sexy.

2nd With porn, filtering is pretty straight forward, if a picture is on ilovegod.com you can pretty much mark it safe. Of course if it is on porn.com or a known porn site it is flagged as porn, even if it isn't.

seant, Jun 24 2009

Well they could have it where if you're logged in to your google account then you have preferences set to your specifications.

porkman, Jun 24 2009