WhyNot?

The Death Penalty

Category: Laws
Responses: 20 (6 in support, 0 neutral, 14 in opposition)
Number of views: 431
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Very weak Very weakYour Rating:

There is currently a debate going on in Britain regarding The Death Penalty. I am in favour of it and most of the polls seem to agree, but the politicians mainly say no.

I say bring back The Death Penalty.

JonLethbridge, Nov 18 2003

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Other ideas in category (Laws):

Comments from other members:

Add your comment

Hang Them All

Tony Blair, Nov 18 2003

The death penalty only serves to continue violence; it is not a deterrence. It costs more than life in prison with no parole. It is highly discriminatory. It is killing in the name of the state--every citizen. It is morally, socially, economically wrong. Stop official killing that is meant to teach people killing is wrong.

mluetchens, Nov 18 2003

Jerry Seinfeld once wondered about the term "death penalty." In his view, it's more than a mere "penalty!" A traffic fine is a penalty - being put to death is on another level entirely.

My feeling is that a government's putting people to death is generally a bad idea. And enabling small subdivisions of government (e.g. the State of New York, etc.) to put people to death is even more unsettling.

If we insist on allowing governmental entities to put people to death, I suggest we broadcast every execution - make watching mandatory in public schools - so we can all witness what is being done in our name.

lindahljack, Nov 18 2003

I think the death penalty has the effect of making us all murderers, fractionally. I think it is therefore reasonable to force everyone to experience the consequences in the form of a broadcast execution, and doubt that many would have the stomach to return for a second helping. In that sense, the "voting" would turn against this punishment, and it might eventually be abolished.

aorrdalca, Nov 21 2003

just saying "bring back the death penalty" is meaningless. When you propose an idea you have to give a reason for it.

The only valid reason I can think of is its deterrence effect.

You have to show that the number of serious crimes committed with a death penalty in effect is lower than when there is no dealth penalty.

trc, Jan 26 2005

Harris County, Texas, executes more people than the other 49 states, combined, yet Houston still has a murder rate that's as high as anywhere in the country.

As a deterrent, it only deters the executed.

In the case of serial killers, I have to wholeheartedly endorse the death penalty, but in other cases, life without parole is a much more fitting punishment, much cheaper, and a better deterrent.

Beaugrand, Nov 06 2005

Is it a deterrent? Call me a coward, but I would rather get a lethal injection than spend the rest of my life in prison without hope of parole. With all of the murder-suicides and suicide (homicide) bomber/killers, could death perhaps NOT be the best deterrent?

Yes, there are many cases of undeniable guilt. But what if one innocent person is put to death --is it worth it? --is it worth it if that person is you?

anthronify, Jun 06 2006