WhyNot?

Make All Text Sizes Relative

Category: Upgrade Features
Responses: 4 (4 in support, 0 neutral, 0 in opposition)
Number of views: 461
Tracking: Track this idea
Community Rating:Average AverageYour Rating:

make all text sizes relative - so that they can be adjusted using the zoom function. The text is extremely small on a 1600x1200 screen. Or maybe I should just get new glasses...

frog, Nov 18 2003

What do you think of this idea or comment?
(You can change your vote at any time)

agree I agree no opinion No opinion disagree I disagree

Users who liked this idea also liked:

Better Brake Light (345 votes) Very strong
like IMDB but for government (86 votes) Very strong
Elevator DeSelect (127 votes) Very strong
Ending the war on drugs (189 votes) Very strong
Aerial pictures in flight (173 votes) Very strong
Refrigerator (88 votes) Very strong
Audio-in Jacks in Cars (148 votes) Very strong
This concept is great! (111 votes) Very strong
worst rated ideas (62 votes) Very strong
Cable TV (89 votes) Very strong

Other ideas in category (Upgrade Features):

Back to same place on page (2 votes) Average
Conglomerate Carriers (1 votes) Average
What's Meant By 'Recent'? (2 votes) Average
how did you find this place? (1 votes) Average
VerticalJavascriptCategoryNav (2 votes) Average
Commercial Free TV (3 votes) Average
Rejected idea (3 votes) Average
Red/Green for idea tracking (2 votes) Average
Edit my comments (4 votes) Average
Catagories (3 votes) Average
Screennames (3 votes) Average
Old Idea Deletion (4 votes) Average
Editing (3 votes) Average
Funny category (2 votes) Average
Most discussed (2 votes) Average
My favourite (2 votes) Average
Pre-loaded iPod (6 votes) Strong
Center Submit Button (1 votes) Average
Who's On-line ? (5 votes) Average
Don't email user's own comment (1 votes) Average
fictional story category (4 votes) Average
Use a graphic for vote-count (1 votes) Average
Place cursor in comment box (1 votes) Average
Comment Organizer (1 votes) Average
Homonym spell-checker (16 votes) Very strong
Need Government Category (1 votes) Average
"Its Done!" option in WhyNot (3 votes) Average
WhyNot Wiki (8 votes) Strong
Unused space (2 votes) Average
"Report as Spam" Button (6 votes) Strong
More Votes & Comments (2 votes) Average
Vote terms (3 votes) Average
Comment feedback (1 votes) Average
Email updates from whynot.net (3 votes) Average
RSS Feed for WhyNot.net (2 votes) Average
Spell Check (7 votes) Average
WhyNot pages Counter (2 votes) Average
Provide Voted Priority (4 votes) Average
Option to Hide Previous Viewed (2 votes) Average
Look List (3 votes) Average
Book on CD (2 votes) Average
Doodle design (3 votes) Average
Delete Ideas (2 votes) Average
Site communication (2 votes) Average
Latest layout (3 votes) Average
Users who hated this idea also (4 votes) Average
Make All Text Sizes Relative (4 votes) Average
Page size (3 votes) Average
additional html tag (1 votes) Average
WhyNot Corporate/Non-Profit (4 votes) Average
No More Secrets (2 votes) Average
Order of Ideas (1 votes) Average
Comments from other members:

Add your comment

I'm all for relative text sizes.

For web designers, there are a couple of issues.

One way of doing relative text sizes is to set the CSS font-size to xx-small, x-small, small, medium, large, x-large, or xx-large.

The trouble with that is that IE displays those one size too small.

Another way is to use em's or percentages.

But some browsers make those relative to the default size, instead of to the size in the parent element.

Lastly, there's 'larger' and 'smaller', but you can imagine that those would be insufficient for the desires of many web designers.

Thus, most turn to absoluter pixels sizes. It's not good, it's not right, and it's contrary to W3C suggestions, but there is a rationale for it.

Want this to stop being a problem? Tell your friends who use older browsers to upgrade to modern browsers that support these correctly.

[Note that is spite of what I said here, I voted 'for'.]

crr, Feb 16 2005