Passenger faces backwards | |||||||||||||||||
What if the passenger seat was reversed so that the person would face the rear? Would this person not be in a safer position relative to front-end collisions vis-a-vis whiplash? Also, the person would be 'facing' the driver so modest interaction would be improved. The passenger would then be in a position also to better notice rear-coming traffic and all things occurring to the rear.
amorgan, Nov 30 2003
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add your comment
I think there are several reasons not to do it: People get sick more often if riding against moving direction (back).There are more rear end hits than full frontal hits. In the front-lateral hits or side hits, passenger attention helps countering the crash effects.
Undoubtedly this would increase safety in passenger cars, buses and airlines, but there is a common prejudice which I share in which I prefer to see where I am going.
I'm neutral on the idea, but the idea reminds me of a story. When I was in the Air Force, I took a cargo flight with several seats facing backwards. One passenger, an experienced F-16 pilot, sat backwards. Although he could handle high G-forces, he couldn't sit backwards. He vomited his lunch.
Besides the obvious problems, how could a passenger help with directions?
Clearly not posted by someone who suffers from travel sickness. Even the idea makes me feel a bit queasy.