Photo Documentation of America | |||||||||||||||||
I am always fascinated by pictures of a location that was taken years apart. It is incredible to see the changes (or the lack therof) from the same vantage point. I propose that the U.S.--or some organization--set up SPECIFIC spots across the U.S. and have a picture taken, say, every two years. Ideally, this spot will be very PRECISE (i.e., it will be necessary to take exactly the same picture, same angle, same lens, same weather, same time of year, etc., every time). Thus, say over the next two centuries, we would have an almost living testament of the growth and change to America. This would not only be important culturally, but would no doubt provide sociological, ecological, and other insights. We would see a barren area grow, perhaps, into a vast city. I think we should do this by setting up concrete and brass (or whatever durable material) "markers" across the nation (say, in 500 locations). These markers would have the precise placement for tripod legs, would detail the direction of the camera, etc. Well, there it is, for whatever it's worth.
aaronescott, Dec 15 2003
What do you think of this idea or comment? | |||||||||||||||||
Users who liked this idea also liked: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other ideas in category (Photography): | |||||
| |||||
Add your comment
This is a great idea, but one thing. I dont see why pictures have to be taken only once every two years. With a handful of local volunteers or just an automated camera, you can take a picture every day or several times a day, showing seasonal and daily cycles. In character, this seems an urban project. What about 500 points just in Chicago or New York? A city has more of a unified existence. If the project is national,I think 500 points is very modest. Also, I don't see a reason, except perhaps image quality, why the images could not be gleaned from preexisting security cameras trained on the streets.
Surveyors should have some good advice regarding this. While you're interested in the cultural posterity aspect, I'm interested in the way locational context is tied into the imagery. When camera makers decide that spatial metadata is feasible and useful, I see such cameras finding use in networks to help track, say, ecological change, urban sprawl, people-counting (parades, demonstrations), threat communication (IEDs in Iraq?), real estate, landmarks and navigation, and so on . . . .